期刊文献+

基于事件确定有限自动机的UML2.0序列图描述与验证 被引量:8

Specification and Verification of UML2.0 Sequence Diagrams Based on Event Deterministic Finite Automata
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了确保软件分析与设计阶段UML2.0序列图模型的可靠性,采用命题投影时序逻辑(propositional projection temporal logic,简称PPTL)模型检测方法对该模型进行分析和验证.提出了事件确定有限自动机(event deterministic finite automata,简称ETDFA),并使用该自动机为序列图建立形式化模型,通过给出的基于ETDFA的PPTL模型检测算法得到验证结果.该方法可以在基于Spin的PPTL模型检测器的支持下实现.实例结果表明,该方法可以验证序列图的性质并保证其可靠性. To ensure the reliability of UML2.0 sequence diagrams(SD),which are used in software analysis and design,propositional projection temporal logic(PPTL) model checking is adopted in this paper.First,event deterministic finite automata(ETDFA) are proposed and used to describe the formal models of SD.Furthermore,an algorithm for model checking ETDFA with PPTL formulas being the properties is presented.Finally,based on the implementation of PPTL model checker,the ETDFA models of SD are verified.Experimental results show that the proposed method is useful in ensuring the reliability of SD.
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期2625-2638,共14页 Journal of Software
基金 国家自然科学基金(60433010 60873018 60910004 91018010 61003078 61003079 61133001) 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)(2010CB328102) 国家教育部博士点基金(200807010012) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(JY10000903004)
关键词 UML2.0序列图 事件确定有限自动机 模型检测 命题投影时序逻辑 验证 UML2.0 sequence diagram event deterministic finite automata model checking propositional projectiontemporal logic verification
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1Object Management Group(OMG). OMG Unified Modeling Language, Specificaiton-Version 1.3[S]. 2000.
  • 2Bruel J H, France R B. Transforming UML Models to Formal Specifications[A]. Proceedings of the Int Conf on Object Oriented Programming Systems Language and Applications(OOPSLA'98) [C]. Vancouver: SIGPLAN Notices, 1998. 22-26.
  • 3Breu B, Hinkel U. Towards a Formalization of the Unified Modeling Language[A]. Proceedings of ECOOP'97--Object Oriented Programming, 11th European Conference[C]. Jyvaeskylae: Springre-Verlag, 1997. 344-366.
  • 4France R, Bruel J M, Larrondo-Petrie M, et al. Exploring the Semantics of UML Type Structures with Z[A]. Proceedings of 2nd IFIP Conf formal Methods for Open Object-based Distributed Systems(FMOODS'97)[C]. London: Chapman and Hall, 1997. 247-260.
  • 5Dupuy S, Ledru Y, Chabre P M. Overview of Roz: a Tool for Integrating UML and Z Specificaitons[A]. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering(CaiSE00)[C]. Stockholm: Springer-Verlag, 2000. 417-430.
  • 6Kim S K, Carrington D. Formalizing the UML Class Diagram Using Object-Z[A]. Proceedings of UML'99: 2nd International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language[C]. Colorado: Springer-Verlag, 1999. 83-98.
  • 7Beeck M. Formalization of UML-statecharts[A]. Gogolla M, Kobryn C(eds), UML 2001--the Unified Modeling Language, Modeling Languages, Concepts, and Tools, 4th International Conference[C]. Toronto: Springer, 2001. 406-421.
  • 8Whittle J. Formal Approaches to Systems Analysis Using UML: an Overview[J]. Journal of Database Management, 2000, 11(4) : 4-13.
  • 9Neilson D, Prasad D. ZedB: a Proof Tool for Z Built on B[A]. Nicholls J E ed, Z User Workshop[C]. York: Sprinser-Verlag, 1992.243-258.
  • 10邵维忠,梅宏.统一建模语言UML述评[J].计算机研究与发展,1999,36(4):385-394. 被引量:102

共引文献2

同被引文献72

引证文献8

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部