摘要
如果仅仅囿于法学领域,比例行政原则中妥当、必要、最小侵害、法益衡量等抽象概念难以摆脱主观色彩。最大限度地使判断标准客观化成为比例行政原则准确适用的重要命题。经济分析法为比例行政原则带来一种数字化的理性视角,弥补该原则运行过程中缺少客观具体衡量标准的缺陷,提供更为理性清晰的推理方式,使其运行不再是单纯逻辑和文字的理论整合。成本收益分析、帕累托效应规则的引入,将使行政手段的类型选择、量度掌控和所涉法益衡量达致理性最优化。对法学中的"比例"进行经济分析,是一种探寻更理性把握比例行政原则的方法论上的尝试。随着学科交叉理论研究的深入以及以判例制度为核心的司法实践的积累,我国急需构建符合国情的践行比例行政原则的技术理论体系。
If only confined to the field of law,the Abstract concept of appropriateness,necessity,the minimum and measure of legal interest in the principle of proportional administration will not get rid of subjective hues.Economic analysis will bring a rational perspective of digital to the principle of proportional administration and make up for the lack of objective and specific measures during the operation of this principle.It also will provide a more clearly rational way of reasoning so that the operation of the principle of proportional administration is no longer a mere integration of logic and theory of writing.With interdisciplinary theoretical research in depth as well as the accumulation of case law system,we need build the technology theoretical system of the principle of prproportional administration which matches China's national conditions.
出处
《烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期31-37,共7页
Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金
2007年度山东大学跨学科交叉研究基金"社会经济与健康类"项目"卫生执法的经济学分析"课题资助
关键词
比例行政原则
经济分析
量化
法益衡量
方法论
proportion
economic analysis
quantitative
measure of legal interest
methodology