两种方法治疗胫骨平台骨折疗效对比观察

Observation of Curative Effects of Treating Tibial Plateau Fracture via 2 Methods

目的:比较非手术与手术治疗胫骨平台骨折疗效。方法:60例住院胫骨平台骨折患者平分为两组-对照组和治疗组,对照组采用外固定治疗治疗,治疗组采用切开内固定资料。结果:两组均随访(6～12)个月,平均9.5个月,经过膝关节临床功能评分,对照组平均(70.5±5.2)分,治疗组平均(85.5±5.5)分,治疗组的膝关节临床功能评分明显好于对照组P>0.05)。同时治疗组的优良率为90.0%,对照组优良率为70.0%,治疗组的优良率明显好于对照组(P>0.05)。结论:手术与非手术治疗胫骨平台骨折都能取得很好的效果,安全可靠,操作简便,在合理运用下都值得推广应用。

Objective： To compare curative effect of treating tibial plaleau fracture via 2.Methods i.e. operation and non-operation methods.Methods： Sixty patients with tibiaI plateau fracture were equally divided into Control Group and Treatment Group. The former was treated with external fixation [non-operation）; however, thc latter was treated with internal fixation （operation） ,Results： Both groups were regularly visited in the following （6-12） months, 9.5 months on Ille average. In the scoring as per cli aical function of knee joint, Control Group obtained the average scores of （70.5 ± 5.2） and Treatment Group average （85.5 ± 5.5 ）. The former sores were remarkably better than the latter. At the same time, cxcellent rotes of Control Group and Treatment Group were 70.0% and 90,0%, with the latter showing a significantly better difference （P〉0.05）.Conclusion： Proper application of both methods is worth promoting for fine effect in treating tibial plateau fiacturc, characterized by satiety, rcliability and convenient operation,