摘要
目的研究Cercon氧化锆陶瓷表面不同处理方法对含有磷酸酯粘接单体的PanaviaF的剪切强度的影响。方法采用600号砂纸打磨、喷砂、硅烷化、喷砂加硅烷化4种表面处理方法,对完全随机分组的4组氧化锆陶瓷试样进行单面处理。在玻璃模具的辅助下,将两块不同规格的试样中心相对地用PanaviaF树脂类水门汀加压粘接固定,万能实验机测定剪切强度并进行统计学分析。结果600号砂纸打磨试样剪切强度(21.50±1.98)、喷砂组剪切强度(23.68±2.31)、硅烷化剪切强度(20.69±1.55)、喷砂+硅烷化(24.01±2.19)MPa,其总体均数不相等,其中,喷砂组和喷砂加硅烷化组高于600号砂纸打磨组和硅烷化组,P〈0.05;喷砂组和喷砂加硅烷化组之间,以及600号砂纸打磨组和硅烷化组之间的差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论喷砂是提高树脂粘接剂与氧化锆陶瓷剪切强度的有效方法,而砂纸打磨和硅烷化并不能显著提高剪切强度。
Objective To study the effect of surface treating methods on the shear strength of Panavia F luting cements to Cercon zirconia. Methods Forty sample disc of Cercon zirconia with 20 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height were prepared. Another 40 sample discswith 5 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height were also prepared Both of the two types of samples were randomly devided into four groups A, B, C, and D in whichdifferent surface treatments were delivered. In group A samples was treated with 600 # sand paper, and in group Bwith sand blasting, and silanization in group C , and sand blasting plus silanization in group D. All samples were bonded with Panavia F luting cement under the aid of glass mould. The value of shear strength was measured and statistically analysed. Results The shear strength of four groups of samples were (21.50 ± 1.98 ), (23.68 ± 2.31 ), ( 20. 69 ± 1, 55 ), ( 24. 01 ± 2. 19 ) MPa respectively. The population mean was not equal. There was no significant difference between 600 # sand paper treated group and silanization group, nor between sand blasting group and sand blasting plus silanization group. Conclusions Sand blasting is a effective means to increase the shear strength, and 600 # sand paper treatment and silanization can't increase the shear strength.
出处
《中华口腔医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第10期613-615,共3页
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
关键词
抗剪切强度
表面处理
粘接剂
Shear strength
Surface treatment
Luting cements