摘要
虽然《左传》叙事的文学性与历史真实性是一种彼此互构的关系,对于《左传》成书有至为重要的作用,但《左传》的这种文学性对历史真实性的消解,使《左传》叙事游离于文学与历史真实之间,使得《左传》虽有史之用,而非史之体,使得《左传》既不属于纯粹的文学著作,也不属于完全意义上的历史著作。
Although the Zuo Zhuan" literary narrative and historical truth is a mutuallyconstitutive relationship to each other, for "Zuo Zhuan" a book to the important role there, but "Zuo Zhuan" the kind of narrative, alienation from literature between truth and history,making the "Zuo Zhuan" Although the history of the use, rather than the history of the body, making the "Tso" is neither a pure literature, nor are the full sense of the history books.
出处
《思茅师范高等专科学校学报》
2011年第4期65-67,共3页
Journal of Simao Teachers' College
关键词
《左传》
叙事
游离性
文学性
历史真实性
"Zuo Zhuan"
narrative history of the authenticity of free literature