所谓现存《唐律疏议》为《永徽律疏》的新证——与郑显文先生商榷

On the So-called New Evidences about the Existing Tang Lü Shu Yi being Yonghui Lü Shu: A Review on the viewpoint of Professor Zheng Xianwen

我国学者杨廷福等曾认为现存《唐律疏议》为《永徽律疏》。郑显文先生最近在敦煌吐鲁番文书的基础上又提出新证,力证《唐律疏议》为《永徽律疏》不谬。但检讨郑显文先生的各项证据,发现并不足以支持现存《唐律疏议》为《永徽律疏》的观点,唯一可以肯定的就是,现存《唐律疏议》并不是永徽四年(653)的《永徽律疏》。

Chinese Scholar YANG Tingfu and other scholar had put forwards a viewpoind that Tang L/i Shu Yi, an existing criminal code of the Tang Dynasty, is Yonghui Lii Shu, a criminal code formulated at the first period of the third emperor of the Tang Dynasty. In 2009, Professor ZHENG Xianwen asserted that viewpoint once again and had provided his conclusion with some new evidences. By a careful re-examination, we don＇t had any helping informations goes close to the conclusion professor ZHENG asserted. Here, we have drawn another conclusion fi：om the evidences he had offered that Tang Lti Shu Yi are definitedly not that yonghui L ü Shu which had compiled in 653A.D..