科技政策研究:嬗变、分化与聚焦被引量：21

Science and Technology Policy Studies:Evolution,Differentiation,and Convergence

导出

摘要随着科技的发展,其社会、经济、政治影响力得到全面扩展和深化,科技政策研究也因此变得越来越丰富而复杂,与此同时,科技政策研究的内涵和外延也变得更加难以界定,传统的科技政策的划分方法已经难以涵盖和解释当前丰富而庞杂的科技政策研究体系。因此,将利用政策分析中"政策场域(Policy Arena)"这一重要概念,对经济商业场域(Economy and Business Arena)、公共行政场域(Public Administration Arena)、公民社会场域(Civil SocietyArena)和道德伦理场域(Morality and Ethics Arena)中的科技政策,从政策主体(Policy Actors)、互动模式(InteractionModels)以及政策目标(Orientation of Policy)三个维度重新进行边界划分和内涵界定。科技政策研究实际上存在广义和狭义之分。广义的科技政策研究包涵所有与科技相关的政策研究,而狭义的科技政策研究为基于"科学—技术—创新"范式展开的科学技术与创新政策研究(STIPS),这也是我们最常见的科技政策研究的界定。从历史发展的角度,对狭义的科技政策研究进行了进一步的梳理和分析。 The political,economical and societal influences of science and technologies are increasingly broadening and deepening,which both enriches the topics of science and technology policy studies（STPS）and makes it difficult to define the connotation and extension of this area.This paper is aimed to indentify the scope of STPS based on the conception of ＇policy arena＇ and deployed in three dimensions of policy actors,interaction models and orientation of policy.We concluded that the science and technology policy studies can be both ＇general ＇and ＇special＇.The general STPS covers all policy studies related to science and technology,while the special STPS is defined as science,technology and innovation policy studies（STIPS） based on the paradigm of ＇science-technology-economy＇.In addition,we discussed the narrow STPS from a historical perspective.

作者周华东

机构地区中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所中国科学院研究生院

出处《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第11期5-13,共9页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

关键词科技政策研究范围政策场域 science and technology policy scope of STPS policy arena

分类号 F204 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献34

1European-Commission. Embedding society in science & te- chnology policy: European and Chinese perspectives[R]. La- dikas Belgium: European Commission, 2009.
2Elzinga A, Jamison A. Changing policy agendas in science and technology[M] // Jasanoff S. Handbook of science and technology studies. Editors:Sage publications, 1995.
3Ruscio K P. Policy cultures: The case of science policyin the United States[J]. Science, Technology & Human Values, 1994,19(2):205-222.
4Neal H A. Beyond sputnik: US science policy in the 21st century[M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press,2008.
5Beck U. World risk society[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999.
6Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in con- temporary societies[M]. London: Sage Publications, 1994.
7Benz A, Kuhlmann S, Sadowski D. Governance: A politi- cal science perspective[M]. New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations, 2007:3-29.
8Freeman C, Soete L. Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past[J]. Research Policy, 2009,38(4):583-589.
9Lundvall B A, Borr~ts S. Science, technology and innov- ation policy[J]. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 2005: 599-631.
10Beck U. Risk society: Towards a new modernity[M]. Lon- don: Sage Publications, 1992.