期刊文献+

基于本质安全的化工工艺物质危险指数研究 被引量:3

Study on Material Hazard Index of Chemical Process Based on Inherent Safety
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立了基于本质安全的化工工艺物质危险性的评价体系,包括火灾危险性、爆炸危险性以及毒性等3个评价指数。基于风险的思想,各个评价指数均包括概率指标与后果指标。为了全面反映化工工艺的实际情况,在各个评价指数中均对所有物质的相应指数值加和。参数的取值以以往的指数法为基础,为了消除边界波动效应,取值采用内插法。由于各个指数的量纲不同,针对3个指数分别比较。以生产乙酸的3条工艺路线为例进行分析,结果表明,本法可用于工艺路线的物质危险性分级,以指导设计初期物质的本质安全化设计。 A framework of material hazard assessment of chemical process based on inherent safety is proposed,including three indices,fire hazard,explosion hazard and toxicity respectively.Probability index and consequence index are defined in each material hazard index based on the concept of risk.The three indices are calculated as the sum of the corresponding index value of all the chemicals involved in the chemical process to comprehensively indicate the hazard of the process route.The scoring of the previous indices is cited in this methodology.However,the interpolation method is used in order to eliminate the border fluctuation effect.Due to the different dimension of the three indices,they are respectively compared.As a case study,the three process routes for acetic acid manufacture are analyzed with the indices above.It is shown that the model proposed is feasible and practical to rank the material hazard of process routes to help focusing on inherent safer design of chemicals in early design phase.
出处 《工业安全与环保》 北大核心 2011年第11期1-4,共4页 Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(No.71001051) 江苏省自然科学基金项目(No.BK2009360 No.BK2010554)
关键词 本质安全 火灾危险性 爆炸危险性 毒性 风险 本质安全化设计 inherent safety fire hazard explosion hazard toxicity risk inherent safer design
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1田震.化工过程开发中本质安全化设计策略[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(12):4-8. 被引量:30
  • 2Chan T, Azmi M. Process route index (PRI) to assess level of explosiveness for inherent safety quantification[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(2): 216- 221.
  • 3Dennis C. An overview of inherently safer design[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2006, 25(2): 98 -107.
  • 4David A, Mike H, Marty R. Advances in Inherent Safety Guidance[J]. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2008, 27(2) : 115 - 120.
  • 5Faisal I, Paul R. How to make inherent safety practice a reality[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2003, 81(1): 2-16.
  • 6J.P. Gupta, David. W. Edwards. A simple graphical method for measuring inherent safety['J~. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003, 104(1 -3) : 15 -30.
  • 7Anna-Marl Heikkila. Inherent safety in process plant design['D-]. Helsinki University of Technology(Espoo, Finland), 1999.
  • 8Chidambaram Palaniappan, Rajagopalan Srinivasan, Reginald Tan. Expert system for the design of inherently safer processes. 1 route selection stage[J]. American Chemical Society, 2002, 41(26): 6 698 -6 710.
  • 9Michela Gentile, William J. Rogers, M. Sam Mannan. Development of an inherent safety index based on fuzzy Logic[J]. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 2003, 49(4) : 959 -968.
  • 10Faisal I. Khan, Paul R. Amyotte. Integrated inherent safety index (I2SI) : A tool for inherent safety evaluation[J]. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2004, 23(2) : 136 - 148.

共引文献27

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部