期刊文献+

澳大利亚研究理事会的科研不端行为处理制度——以《澳大利亚负责任研究行为准则》为核心的探讨 被引量:4

On the Australian Research Council's Legal Framework Dealing with Research Misconduct: A Discussion Centered on Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为澳大利亚国内最重要的国家科学基金机构,澳大利亚研究理事会(ARC)已经构建起一套关于科研不端行为的应对处理机制,包含一系列实体性法律标准及程序规定,涉及科研不端行为调查处理的一般性程序、法律责任、违法者权利保护、程序公平等问题,其中包含着可为我国有关立法所借鉴的有益经验。 The Australian Research Council has established a systematical legal framework dealing with research misconduct. This legal framework consists of a set of substantial legal standards and legal procedures involving the general process of inves tigating and punishing of research misconduct, the responsibilities for offences, and the protection of offenders' rights, proce- dural fairness during investigation, etc. Furthermore, this framework also contains some helpful experience for the research in- tegrity legislation in China.
出处 《山东科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第4期40-45,共6页 Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词 澳大利亚研究理事会 科研不端行为 法律制度 Australian Research Council research misconduct, legal framework
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1NHMRC, ARC. Australian code for the responsible conduct of researeh[EB/OL]. [2011-04-20]. http..//www, nhmrc, gov. au/_files_nhmre/file/publications/synopses/r39, pdf.
  • 2ARC. Discovery Projects Funding Rules for funding commencing in 2011[EB/OL]. [2010-02-21]. http://www, arc. gov. au/ pdf/DP11 fundingagreement, pdf.
  • 3NHMRC, ARC. Proposal to establish an Australian Research Integrity Committee[ EB/OL]. [2010-02-21]. http: ,//www. arc. gov. au/pdf/researeh_ARICproposal, pdI.

同被引文献34

  • 1饶武元,李文静.研究生学术道德认知的研究——基于江西高校全日制硕士研究生的调查与分析[J].教育学术月刊,2013(11):70-75. 被引量:8
  • 2李保玉,崔海浪,王亚娟.国内学术腐败研究综述[J].山西师大学报(社会科学版),2010,37(S3):134-136. 被引量:5
  • 3陈爱娟,张林,弋敏.科研不端行为的成因与治理[J].技术与创新管理,2005,26(5):27-29. 被引量:11
  • 4王会,田士威.高校科研不端行为的成因及其对策[J].中国高校科技与产业化,2007(7):46-47. 被引量:6
  • 5Steneck N H. Fostering integrity in research:definitions, current knowledge, and future directions[J]. Sci Eng Ethics,2006,12(1) :53-74.
  • 6Park E J, Park S, Jang I S. Clinical misconduct among south Korean nursing students[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2014,34(4) :1-7.
  • 7Fierz K, Gennaro S, Dierickx K, et al. Scientific miscon- duct: also an issue in nursing science? [J]. J Nurs Scho- larsh, 2014,46 (4) : 271-280.
  • 8Schmidt K L, Yasko L, Green M, et al. Evolution of an innovative approach to the delivery of in-person training in the responsible conduct of research[J]. Clin Transl Sci,2014,7(5) :121-132.
  • 9Schmaling K B, Blume A W. Ethics instruction increases graduate students responsible conduct of research know- ledge but not moral reasoning[J]. Account Res, 2009,16 (5) : 268-283.
  • 10Plemmons D K, Brody S A, Kalichman M W. Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the re- sponsible conduct of researeh[J]. Sci Eng Ethics, 2006, 12(3) : 571-582.

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部