摘要
对《四库全书总目》小说家的序文存在的问题进行辩正,指出:张衡《西京赋》"小说九百,本自虞初"之"小说"专指《虞初周说》一种;以《虞初周说》为立论的基础不能成立;《汉志》小说家注云"依托也"的作品,其产生的时期在《汉志》那里并不清楚;不能靠《虞初周说》一家作品的篇数之多来推断小说的创作"特盛于虞初",还应充分考虑从事小说创作的作者是否较多。
The paper makes several rectifications on the preface of the Sikuquanshuzongmu＇s Xiaoshuojia, points out that the xiaoshuo in Zhangheng＇ s Xifingfu refers specifically to Yuchuzhoushuo, it is unreasonable that takes Yuchuzhoushuo as the basic of the discourse, the books annotated by Hanzhi that they were writed under the else＇ s name can not be survey the time that they were writed, and it must fully eonsider the quantity of the writers not just the quantity of the pieces of Yuchuzhoushuo.
出处
《图书情报工作》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第21期143-146,共4页
Library and Information Service
基金
2011年国家社会科学基金西部项目“《汉书·艺文志》注解长编及研究”(项目编号:11XTQ013)研究成果之一
