摘要
有关罗素逻辑原子的简单性问题一直以来都存在着争议,这主要是由于他在不同时期不同本文中一些相互冲突、十分含糊的说辞造成的。文章将立足罗素与逻辑原子主义相关的一手文献,将简单分为两类:绝对简单和相对简单,分别探讨这些争论的焦点所在,并为罗素那些看似矛盾的说法给出自己的解释,也即为逻辑分析的方法正名。
There have been some debates on the simplicity of Russell＇s logical atoms all the time,which was mainly brought about by his some conflicting and ambiguous statements in different texts during his different phases.On the basis of ＂The Philosophy of Logical Atomism＂ and other related first hand and secondary literatures,I will distinguish Russell＇s simplicity into two kinds： absolute simple and relative simple,discuss the controversial points respectively,give my interpretation for Russell＇s apparently conflicting statements,and justify for the method of logical analysis.
出处
《兰州学刊》
CSSCI
2011年第10期11-15,共5页
关键词
逻辑原子
绝对简单
相对简单
逻辑分析
logical atoms
absolute simple
relative simple
logical analysis
