基于相关性判据的学术信息检索系统成功模型实证分析被引量：4

Empirical Analysis on Relevance Criteria Oriented Academic Information Retrieval System Success Model

导出

摘要围绕面向相关性判据的学术信息检索系统成功模型(AIRSSM),采用结构方程模型进行实证分析。研究结果显示在学术信息检索系统的分析与设计中需要关注三个方面:(1)系统质量与信息质量导向;(2)均衡考虑系统质量的各影响因素;(3)权威性、完整性、实时性以及有效性不可或缺。 In this paper, empirical analysis on AIRSSM is carried out based on structural equation model. The results show that special emphasis of scholarly information retrieval systems analysis and design should be focused on ：（ 1 ） System quality and information quality oriented ; （2） A balanced consideration of all factors affecting system quality ; （ 3 ） Authority, integrity, real- time and effectiveness are essential to information quality.

作者成颖

机构地区南京大学信息管理系

出处《现代图书情报技术》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第10期45-53,共9页 New Technology of Library and Information Service

基金国家社会科学基金项目"中文学术信息检索系统相关性集成研究"(项目编号:10CTQ027) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"面向用户的相关性标准及其应用研究"(项目编号:07JA870006)的研究成果之一

关键词学术信息检索系统相关性判据信息系统成功模型 TEDS模型结构方程模型 Academic information retrieval system Relevance criteria Information system success model TEDS Structural equation model

分类号 G250.7 [文化科学—图书馆学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献5

1成颖.基于相关性判据的学术信息检索系统成功模型建构[J].现代图书情报技术,2011(9):46-53. 被引量：7
2Bailey J E,Pearson S W. Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction [ J ]. Management Science, 1983,29 (5) :530-545.
3Venkatesh V, Morris M G, Davis G B, et al. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View[ J]. MIS Quarterly, 2003,27(3) :425 -478.
4吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京：中国铁道出版,2001..
5Perez-Mira B. Validity of DeLone and McLean's Model of Information Systems Success at the Web Site Level of Analysis [ D ]. Louisiana State University,2010.

二级参考文献23

1Mizzaro S. Relevance : The Whole History [ J ]. Journal of the Amer- ican Society for Information Science, 1997, 48(9) :810 -832.
2Saracevic T. Relevance : A Review of the Literature and a Frame- work for Thinking on the Notion in Information Science. Part II: Nature and Manifestations of Relevance [ J ]. Journal of the Ameri- can Society for Information Science and Technology,2007,58 ( 3 ) : 1915 - 1933.
3Venkatesh V, Morris M G, Davis G B, et al. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View[ J]. MIS Quarter- ly, 2003, 27(3):425-478.
4Schamber L. Relevance and Information Behavior[ J ]. Annual Re- view of lnforrm~tion Science and Technology, 1994,29: 3 -48.
5Taylor R S. Value- added Processes in hrformation Systems [ M ]. Norwood, NJ : Ablex Publishing, 1986.
6Scholl H J, Eisenberg M B, Dirks L, et al. The TEDS Framework for Assessing Information Systems from a Human Actors' Perspec- tive: Extending and Repurposing Taylor's Value - Added Model [ J ]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2011, 62(4): 789-804.
7Wang P. Contextualizing User Relevance Criteria: A Meta - ethno- graphic Approach to User- centered Relevance Studies[ C ]. In:Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Information Interaction in Context. 2010 : 293 - 298.
8DeLone W H, McLean E R. Information System Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable [ J ]. Information System Re- search, 1992, 3(1) : 60-95.
9DeLone W H, McLean E R. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success : A Ten - Year Update [ J ]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003, 19 (4) :9 - 30.
10Seddon P B. A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success [ J ]. Information Systems Research, 1997, 8(3): 240-253.