期刊文献+

产品功能定位与创新内生溢出决策模型研究 被引量:3

Analysis on decision-making model of product function positioning and innovation endogenous spillovers
原文传递
导出
摘要 为揭示内生溢出的基本规律,建立了含有两种替代率参数的动态博弈模型,研究了在内生溢出假设下水平差异双寡头厂商的产品功能定位—–定价和创新投入问题.研究发现,内生溢出条件下产品定位差异一般显示出按各种参数的变化在最大与最小差异之间分布的特点,最大和最小差异仅仅是所提出模型的特例;创新投入与创新效率和吸收能力之间以及产品定位差异与各参数之间存在几种正相关与负相关函数关系,揭示了水平差异产品内生溢出和低成本创新的一些特点. To demonstrate basic laws of endogenous spillover of innovation,a kind of three-stage dynamic game theory modle with two substitution rates is introduced to probing positioning-pricing innovation input and analyzed by using a game model.It is found that the equilibrium position of duopoly distributes between minimum and maximum differentiation which are merely special cases in new model.Some types of increasing or decreasing functions exist between innovation input of firms and their innovation efficiency or absorption ability as well as between position differentiation and parameters,which shows the characteristic of endogenous spillover and low cost innovation of equilibrium differentiation.
作者 陈圻 张毅
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期1685-1689,1694,共6页 Control and Decision
基金 国家哲学社会科学基金重点项目(11AGL001) 国家自然科学基金项目(79860007) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(08JA630038)
关键词 创新 研究开发 功能定位 创新投入 动态博弈 内生溢出 innovation R&D function positioning innovation input dynamic game endogenous spillover
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Hotelling H. Stability in competition[J]. Economic J, 1929, 153(39): 41-57.
  • 2D'Aspremont C, Jacquemin A. Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spiUovers[J]. American Economic Review, 1988, 78(5): 1133-1137.
  • 3罗延发,贾生华.横向产品差异化模型述评[J].技术经济,2006,25(3):95-96. 被引量:4
  • 4Salop S M. Monopolistic competition with outside goods[J]. Bell J of Economics, 1979, 10(1): 141-156.
  • 5D'Aspremont C, Gabszewicz J, Thisse J -F. On Hotelling's stability in competition[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(5): 1145-1150.
  • 6de Frutos M A, Hamoudi H, Jarque X. Equilibrium existence in the circle model with linear quadratic transport cost[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1999, 29(5): 605-615.
  • 7Hamoudi H, Moral M J. Equilibrium existence in the linear model: Concave versus convex transportation costs[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2005, 84(2): 201-219.
  • 8de Frutos A, Harnoudi H, Xarque X. Spatial competition with concave transport costs[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2002, 32(4): 531-540.
  • 9侯光明,艾凤义.基于混合溢出的双寡头横向R&D合作[J].管理工程学报,2006,20(4):94-97. 被引量:57
  • 10Piga C, Poyago-Theotoky J. Endogenous R&D spillovers and locational choice with discriminatory pricing[J].Managerial and Decision Economics, 2004, 25(3): 127- 139.

二级参考文献9

  • 1张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,2000.P82-85.
  • 2d'Aspremont, C, Jaskold Gabszewicz & J. - F. Thisse (1979), On Hotelling's stability in competition, Econometrica, Vol.47, pp.1145- 1150
  • 3Economides, N. (1986), Minimal and maximal product differentiation in Hotelling's duopoly, Economics Letters, Vol.21, pp.67- 71
  • 4Hotelling, H. (1929), Stability in competition, Economic Journal, Vol.39, pp.41 -57
  • 5Irmen, A. & Thisse, J. - F. (1998), Competition in multi - characteristics spaces: Hotelling was almost fight, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol.78, pp.76- 102
  • 6Salop, S.C. (1979), Monopolistic competition with outside goods, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, pp. 141 - 156
  • 7D'Aspremont,C,Jacquemin,A.Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J].American Economic Review,1988,78:1133 ~ 1137.
  • 8Amir,R.Modelling imperfectly appropriable R&D via spillovers[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,2000,18:1013 ~1032.
  • 9Poyogo-Theotoky,J.Equilibrium and optimal size of a research joint venture in an oligopoly with spillovers[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics,1995,XLⅢ(2):209 ~ 226.

共引文献58

同被引文献62

  • 1芮明杰,李想.差异化、成本领先和价值创新——企业竞争优势的一个经济学解释[J].财经问题研究,2007(1):37-44. 被引量:39
  • 2泰勒尔.产业组织理论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.529.
  • 3迈克尔·波特.竞争优势[M].北京:华夏出版社,1997..
  • 4多纳德·海,德理克·莫瑞斯.产业经济学与组织[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1998.
  • 5陈圻.总成本领先战略研究的回顾与反思[J].现代经济探讨,2007(10):5-9. 被引量:13
  • 6Campbell-Hunt, Colin. What have we learned about generic competitive strategy? A meta-analysis [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21 (2): 127-154.
  • 7Tyagi R K. Cost leadership and pricing[J]. Econo- mies Letters,2001,72(2) : 189- 193.
  • 8Tanaka Y. Profitability of price and quantity strate- gies in a duopoly with vertical product differentiation [J]. Economic Theory, 2001,17 (3) : 693- 700.
  • 9Yin X K, Yew-Kwang N. Quantity precommitment and bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes: A ease with product differentiation [J]. Australian Economic Papers, 1997,36 (68) : 14-22.
  • 10Furth D, Kovenock D. Price leadership in a duopoly with capacity constraints and product differentiation [J]. Journal of Economics, 1993,57(1) : 1-35.

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部