期刊文献+

猪EPHA1基因多态性及其与产仔数的关联性分析 被引量:4

Association Analysis between Polymorphisms of EPHA1 Gene and Litter Size in Pigs
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究利用PCR-SSCP技术对大白、长白和杜洛克猪EPHA1基因外显子多态性及其与产仔数的关系进行了研究。结果表明:在第15外显子上检测到一个发生G→C颠换的突变位点,形成3种基因型。对于大白猪,3-6胎的GG型个体的产活仔数(NBA)比CC型个体高出1.66头(P〈0.05);在所有胎次中,GG型个体的总产仔数(TNB)比CC型个体高出0.2头(P〈0.01)。对于长白猪,第2胎GG型个体的TNB和NBA分别比CC型个体高出1.41头(P〈0.05)和1.46头(P〈0.05);所有胎次中,GC型个体TNB比CC型个体高出0.67头(P〈0.05)。对于杜洛克猪,3种基因型个体的TNB和NBA差异不显著(P〉0.05)。对于试验大白猪群体而言,该多态位点GG基因型可作为TNB性状的标记基因型。 The polymorphism EPHA1 gene of pig(Large White,Landrace and Duroc) was studied by PCR SSCP,and the association between the polymorphism and litter size was analyzed in order to find the molecular marker being used in marker-assisted selection(MAS) to accelerate the swine breeding progress.There were one polymorphisms occurring in exon15,which change from G to C,with three genotypes(GG,CG and CC).In Large White,GG genotype had significantly higher(P0.05) NBA than CC genotype in third to sixth parity,and in all parities,GG genotype had greatly significantly higher(P0.01) TNB than CC;In Landrace,GG genotype had significantly higher(P0.05)TNB and NBA than CC genotype in the second parity,and in all parities,GC genotype had significantly higher(P0.05) TNB than CC genotype.In Duroc,there was no significant difference on TNB and NBA.In Large White,the GG genotype was favorable marker genotype for TNB and NBA.
出处 《中国畜牧杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第21期1-5,共5页 Chinese Journal of Animal Science
基金 国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-36) 北京市科技计划(Z101105000810001)
关键词 PCR-SSCP EPHA1 产仔数 PCR-SSCP EPHA1 litter size pigs
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1罗超,田刚,许民辉.Eph受体和Ephrin配体的研究进展[J].中国癌症杂志,2003,13(1):79-82. 被引量:8
  • 2Hirai H, Maru Y, Hagiwara K, etal. A novel putative tyrosine kinase receptor encoded by the Eph gene [J]. Science, 1987, 238 (4834): 1717-1720.
  • 3Owshalimpur D, Kelley M J. Genomic structure of the EphA1 receptor tyrosine kinase gene [J]. Mol Cell Probes, 1999, 13(3): 169-173.
  • 4Nakada M, Niska J A, Train N L, et al. EphB2/R-Ras signaling regulates glionaa cell adhesion, growth and invasion [J]. Am J Pathol, 2005, 167(2): 565-576.
  • 5Fujiwara H, Yoshida S, Tatsumi K, et al. Human endometrialepithelial ceils express Ephrin AI: possible interaction between human blastocysts and endometrium via Eph-ephrin systeme[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2002, 87(12): 5801-5807.
  • 6Fujiwara H, Tatsumi K, Kenzo Kosaka, et al. Eph-ephrin A system regulates murine blastocyst attachment and spreading [J]. Dev Dyn, 2006, 235(12): 3250-3258.
  • 7黄培堂.分子克隆实验指南(第三版)[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.1695-1697.
  • 8Lin H C, Liu G F, Wang A G, et al. Effect of polymorphism in the leukemia inhibitory factor gene on litter size in Large White pigs[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2009, 36(7): 1833-1838.
  • 9Wu Y P,Wang A G,Li Net al. Association with TGF-/β1 gene polymorphisms and reproductive performance of Large White pig [J]. Reprod Dom Anim, 2010, 45(6), 1028-1032.
  • 10Wang G Y, Kong L J, Fu J L, et al. Effect of polymorphism in the peroxisome proliferators -activated receptor gamma gene on litter size of pigs[J]. Mol Bid Rep, 2011, 38(3): 1807-1812.

二级参考文献21

  • 1Eph Nomenclature Committee. Unified nomenclature for Eph family receptors and their ligands, the ephrins (letter) [ J ]. Cell,1997,90(3): 403-404.
  • 2Bruckner K, Pasquale EB, Klein R. Tyrosine phosphorylation of transmembrane ligands for Eph receptors [ J ]. Science, 1997,275(5306): 1640-1643.
  • 3Buchert M, Schneider S, Meskenaite V, et al. The junction associated protein AF-6 interacts and clusters with specific Eph receptor tyrosine kinases at specialized sites of cell-cell contact inthe brain. [J]. J Cell Biol,1999,144(2): 361-371.
  • 4Daniel TO, Stein E, Cerretti DP, et al. ELK and LERK-2 in developing kidney and microvascular endothelial assembly [ J ]. Kidney Int, 1996,57 (Suppl): S73 -81.
  • 5Xu Q, Mellitzer G, Robinson V, et al. In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins [ J ]. Nature, 1999,399 ( 6733 ): 267-271.
  • 6Donoghue M J, Rakic P. Molecular evidence for the early specification of presumptive functional domains in the embryonic primate cerebral cortex [ J ]. J Neurosci, 1999,19 ( 14 ): 5967- 5979.
  • 7Drescher U. The Eph family in the patterning of neural development: review [ J ]. Curr Biol, 1997,7 ( 12 ): R799 -807.
  • 8Nakamoto M, Cheng H J, Friedman GC, et al. Topographically specific effects of ELF-1 on retinal axon guidance in vitro and retinal axon mapping in vivo[ J]. Cell, 1996,86(5): 755-766.
  • 9Feldheim DA, Vanderhaeghen P, Hansen M J, et al.Topographic guidance labels in a sensory projection to the forebrain[ J]. Neuron, 1998,21(6): 1303-1313.
  • 10Vanderhaeghen P, Lu Q, Prakash N, et al. A mapping label required for normal scale of body representation in the cortex[J]. Nat Neurosci,2000,3( 4 ) : 358-365.

共引文献16

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部