期刊文献+

WAVEWATCH Ⅲ和SWAN模式在南海北部海域海浪模拟结果的对比分析 被引量:19

Simulations of the northern South China Sea using WAVEWATCH Ⅲ and SWAN
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于1987年9月到1988年8月期间南海北部的一个浮标资料,首先分析了美国环境预报中心(NCEP)和国家大气研究中心(NCAR)联合推出的再分析风场在南海北部海域的适用性,结果表明NCEP/NCAR再分析风场在一定程度上与浮标观测结果相一致。然后利用NCEP/NCAR再分析风场作为海浪模式输入场,评估了WAVEWATCHⅢ(WW3)和Simulating Waves Nearshore(SWAN)这2个海浪模式在南海北部海域模拟海浪的能力,结果表明在季风和季风转换期间,WW3模式和SWAN模式对有效波高的模拟能力几乎一致。在季风期间,WW3模式对平均波周期的模拟能力优于SWAN模式;而在季风转换时期,SWAN模式模拟平均波周期的能力较好。此外,还利用WW3模拟结果分析了南海北部海域海浪的空间分布特征,分析结果表明有效波高受季风影响呈显著的季节变化,平均波周期呈现相对显著的半年变化。 We study the applicability of the National Centers Environmental Prediction/University Corporation for At-mospheric Research(NCEP/NCAR) reanalysis wind field using the buoy data including the wind speed,significant wave height and mean wave period from September 1987 to August 1988 in the northern South China Sea(SCS).To some extent,the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis wind speed is consistent with the buoy data in the northern SCS.Then we assess the simulations using wave models WAVEWATCH Ⅲ(WW3) and Simulating Waves Nearshore(SWAN) forced by the NCEP/NCAR re-analysis data.The results show that the simulations of the significant wave height(SWH) from the two models are almost the same during the monsoon and monsoon transition periods.The simulation of the mean wave period(MWP) from the WW3 is better than that from the SWAN during the monsoon period,while the results are just contrary during the monsoon transition period.The spatial characteristics from the WW3 simulation in the northern SCS are presented.The SWH affected by mon-soon shows significant seasonal change in the northern SCS,while the MWP presents certain semi-annual variability.
出处 《热带海洋学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期27-37,共11页 Journal of Tropical Oceanography
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2008AA09A404-3) 科技基础性工作专项(2008FY110100)
关键词 南海北部 WAVEWATCH SWAN 有效波高 平均波周期 northern South China Sea WAVEWATCH Ⅲ SWAN significant wave height mean wave period
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1WAMDI GROUE The WAM model: A third generation wind wave model [J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1998, 18: 1775-1810.
  • 2SWAMP GROUR Ocean Wave Modeling [M]. New York: Plenum Press, 1985: 256.
  • 3TOLMAN H L, BALASUBRAMANIYAN B, BURROUGHS L D, et al. Development and implementation of wind generated ocean surface wave models at NCEP [J]. Weather and Forecasting, 2002, 17(2): 311-333.
  • 4TOLMAN H L. User manual and system documentation of WACEWATCH III version 2.22[R]. Washington, USA: NOAA/NWS/NCEP, 2002. 1-139.
  • 5TOLMAN H L. Validation of a new global wave forecast system at NCEP [M]. Washington, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1998, 777-786.
  • 6WINGEART K M, REILLY W C, HERBERS T H C, et al. Validation of operational global wave prediction models with spectral buoy data[M]. Washington, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2001, 590-599.
  • 7RIS R C, HOLTHUIJSEN L H, BOOIJ N. A third generation wave model for coastal regions 2. verification [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1999, 104(C4): 7667-7681.
  • 8ROGERS W E, KAIHATU J M, HSU L, et al. Forecasting and hindcasting waves with the SWAN model in the South- ern California Bight [J]. Coastal Engineering, 2007, 54: 1-15.
  • 9CHU P C, LU S H, CHEN Y C. Temporal and spatial vari- abilities of South China Sea surface temperature anomaly [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1997, 102(C9): 20937-20955.
  • 10齐义泉,施平,毛庆文.南海海面风场和波浪场季节平均特性的卫星遥感分析[C]//第一界全国海事技术研讨会文集.上海:上海科技文献出版社,2003:63-69.

同被引文献175

引证文献19

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部