期刊文献+

影响图的扩展综述 被引量:1

A Survey on Extension of Influence Diagrams
下载PDF
导出
摘要 影响图是单决策人基于不确定信息表示和求解复杂决策问题的图模型,已成为一种流行的标准建模工具。由于决策环境纷繁复杂,决策问题多种多样,没有任何一种建模工具能够普遍适用于各种决策问题。为了表示复杂决策问题,增强影响图的表达能力,研究者对影响图进行了多种扩展。从建模无限制决策问题、非对称决策问题、涉及连续变量的决策问题、涉及非精确变量的决策问题及多Agent决策问题等方面对影响图的扩展进行了较为全面的回顾与分析,指出了有关影响图的进一步研究方向。关键词:决策;影响图;无限制决策;非对称决策; Influence diagrams (IDs) are graphical models for representing and solving complex decision-making problems based on uncertain information for a single decision maker. IDs have become a popular and standard modeling tool. However, there are various decision-making problems in real-world, so the need to represent a vari- ety of complex problems leads to the extensions of influence diagram methodology to increase their representation power. This paper reviews the extensions associated with influence diagrams for representing unconstrained, asym- metric, continuous, qualitative and multi-agent decision problems, and describes the relevant further researches on IDs.
出处 《计算机科学与探索》 CSCD 2011年第11期961-975,共15页 Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金No.61163003 61063008 云南省自然科学基金No.2010CD025 云南大学校基金No.2009F29Q~~
关键词 决策 影响图 无限制决策 非对称决策 多AGENT决策 decision-making influence diagrams unconstrained decision asymmetric decision multi-agent decision
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献18

  • 1王红卫,李琛,刘会新.马尔可夫决策过程复杂性的熵测度[J].控制与决策,2004,19(9):983-987. 被引量:10
  • 2张润梅,王浩,姚宏亮,方宝富.影响图及其在Robocup中的应用[J].系统仿真学报,2005,17(1):134-137. 被引量:6
  • 3Howard R A, Matheson J E. Influence diagrams//Howard R A, Matheson J E eds. Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, Menlo Park: Strategic Decisions Group, 1984, 2:719 792
  • 4ZHANG Wei-Hong, Ji Qiang. A faetorization approach to evaluating simultaneous influence diagrams. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, 2006, 36 (4): 746-757
  • 5Koller D, Milch B. Multi-agent influence diagrams for representing and solving games//Proceedings of the IJCAI. Seattle, USA, 2001:1024-1034
  • 6Gal Y, Pfeffer A. A language for modeling Agents decision making processes in games//Proceedings of the AAMAS- 2nd. Melbourne, Australia, 2003:265-272
  • 7Marengoni Mauricio. Decision making and uncertainty management in a 3D reconstruction system. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2003, 25(7): 852-858
  • 8Koller D, Parr R. Computing factored value functions for polieies in struetured MDPs//Proeeedings of the IJCAI-99. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999:1332-1339
  • 9Carlos Guestrin, Daphne Koller. Efficient solution algorithms for factored MDPs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2003, 19(10): 399-468
  • 10Barto A G, Mahadevan. Recent advances in hierarchical reinforcement learning. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications, 2003, 13(1/2) : 41-77

共引文献13

同被引文献12

  • 1Nielsen N M, Hartford D N D, MacDonald J J. Selec- tion of tolerable risk criteria for dam safety decision making [ C]. Proc. 1994 Canadian Dam Safety Confer- ence, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Vancouver: BiTech Pub- lishers, 1994: 355-369.
  • 2Frieser B: Probabilistic evacuation decision model for river floods in the Netherlands [ R]. Final report, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands, 2004, 138p.
  • 3BC Hydro: Guidelines for consequence-based dam safety evaluations and improvements [ S]. Hydroelectric Engi- neering Division Report No. H2528, BC Hydro, Burna- by, BC, Canada, 1993.
  • 4USBR ( US Bureau of Reclamation) : Guidelines for a- chieving public protection in dam safety decision making [ S ]. Dam Safety Office, US Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO, USA, 1997.
  • 5Ancold: Guidelines on Risk Assessment. Working group on risk assessment [ S ]. Australian National Committee Large Dams, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 1998.
  • 6Smith P J, Kojiri T, Sekii K. Risk-based flood evacua- tion decision using a distributed rainfall-runoff model [R]. Annuals of Disas. Prev. Res. Inst., Kyoto Univ. _ No. 49 B. 2006.
  • 7Peng M, Zhang L M: Dynamic decision making lor dam-break emergency management-part 1: Theoretical framework [ J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sci- ences ( Accepted).
  • 8Peng, M. , and Zhang, L.M. Dynamic decision making for dam-break emergency management-part 2: Applica- tion to Tangjiashan Landslide Dam failure [ J ]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (Accepted) (2012).
  • 9Howard R A, Matheson J E. Influence diagrams [ J ]. Decision Analysis, 2005, 2(3) : 127-143.
  • 10Peng M, Zhang, L M: Analysis of human risks due to dam break floods-part 1 : A new model based on Bayes- ian networks [ J]. Natural Hazards, 2012, 64(1) :903- 933.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部