期刊文献+

新化工装置风险评价方法的研究 被引量:2

Study on the methods of risk assessment for new chemical facilities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 回顾了中国与欧美化工新装置风险评价技术的发展,分析了中国与欧美风险评价的异同、中国风险评价存在的问题。结合作者的实践,介绍与讨论了新化工装置设立安全评价阶段的风险评价方法,推荐和介绍了物理化学方法作为评价方法应用的实例。专家分析评议法、物理化学方法、评价软件模拟等评价方法的综合使用,尽可能地做到根据经验、专业知识从已建装置分析拟建装置、利用物化方法较系统地分析装置反应过程、利用评价软件直观地模拟风险,各种评价方法互补、定性与定量互补,从而较系统、完整地完成化工新装置的安全评价工作,以减少装置的安全隐患,有助于使装置顺利地投入运行。 In this paper the developing of risk assessment technique in China,Europe and American were reviewed,and the differences between Europe,American and China was analyzed,as well as the problems of risk assessment in China.The methods of hazard risk assessment for new chemical facilities and process plant in the stage of safety assessment prior to start were introduced and discussed considering the practice of authors.The utilization of physical chemistry as a method of risk assessment was proposed and introduced,and some examples were given.To study the hazards of new facilities more systematically and integrally,a series of methods could be used synthetically,such as the analysis and assessment by experts,method of physical chemistry and assessment software.For this purpose,technicians should analyse new process plant based on the experience and special knowledge from in-severce units,analyse chemical reaction process with method of physical chemistry logically,and simulate the scenarios with assessment software apparently. In this way,various kinds of assessment methods could supplement each other,and qualitative methods and quantitative methods could also complement mutually.This work could decrease the potential hazards of the new chemical facilities and contribute to the successful start-up of the new facilities.
出处 《中国安全生产科学技术》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第10期154-159,共6页 Journal of Safety Science and Technology
关键词 新装置 风险评价 安全评价 评价方法 物理化学 new facilities risk assessment safety assessment method of risk assessment physical chemistry
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Dick Baum, etc. Improved Integration LOPA with HAZOP Analyses [J]. Process Safety Progress, 2009, 28 (4) : 308-311.
  • 2William Bill Bridges and Tony Clark. Key Issues with Im- plementing LOPA [J]. Process Safety Progress, 2010,29 (2) :103-107.
  • 3(美)Center for Chemical Process Safety编著.白永忠等译.保护层分析-简化的过程风险评估[M].北京:中国石化出版社,2010.
  • 4R. Wayne Garland. Quantitative Risk Assessment Case Study for Organic Acid Processes [J]. Process Safety Pro- gress ,2010,29 (3) :247-253.
  • 5Aydann Acikalin. Integration of Safety Management Ef- fectiveness [J]. Process Safety Progress, 2008,28 ( 4 ) : 331-337.
  • 6Katherine (Kate)Fililppin and Lachlan Dreher. Major Hazard Risk Assessment for Existing and New Facilities [J]. Process Safety Progress, 2004,23 (4) : 237-243.
  • 7陶氏化学公司.陶氏化学工艺安全风险管理经验交流会(国家化学品登记中心主办)培训教材,2008.
  • 8巫志鹏,李凯花,白永忠,葛春涛,王俊颖,张亚丽.欧洲化工企业SHE评估与本质安全设计[J].安全、健康和环境,2008,8(8):2-3. 被引量:5
  • 9齐海桃,蒋军成.HAZOP技术在氨合成塔危险辨识中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):104-108. 被引量:21
  • 10王文静,孙标,郭开华.液化天然气场站事故定量风险评价方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):114-117. 被引量:8

二级参考文献23

共引文献38

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部