期刊文献+

社区卫生服务个人绩效考核相关指标分析 被引量:6

Analysis of community health services related to individual-performance appraisal index
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析社区卫生服务个人绩效分值统计方法,探讨绩效分值管理指标、薪酬分配的可行性。方法广外医院五个社区站共有员工42名,采用统一分值计算,以服务数量、服务质量和居民满意度为主要二级指标,对个人绩效设计三级考核标准,运用标准服务量比对法,进行分值统计,得出个人绩效分值、绩效奖金数值。结果 6个月绩效分值统计结果表明:绩效分值统领薪酬分配确实较原分配方法有可比性,凸显差异,但社区基本医疗和公共卫生内容琐碎,弹性大,突发性和临时性工作常有,难于比对标准分值,绩效奖金缺乏公平性。结论绩效分值考核方法基本能反映医、护、药部门劳动强度,但真正实施需要在某些指标及细节方面加以调整,同时加强监督考核手段,真正体现社区医务人员工作性质和责任风险。 Objective To analyze the statistical methods for the purpose of evaluating community health services and individual performance scores so as to explore the performance score,management indicators and the feasibility of salary distribution.Methods There were 42 employees in GuangWai hospital's five community stations.Unified score calculation was used.The number of services,service quality and resident satisfaction were the main secondary indicators.Three-level individual performance appraisal standard was designed.The comparison of the standard service performance was applied to calculate the scores,and thus,to obtain individual performance scores and performance bonus value.Results 6-month performance scores showed that:the method of the performance scores was better than that of the original way of allocating salary.It had the advantage of comparability and highlighting the difference and change.However,the basic clinical and public health work of the community are quiite scattered,flexible,urgent and temporary,it is difficult to standardize the scores,therefore,lack of accuracy and fairness.Conclusions Performance-score evaluation method can basicly reflect the intensity of the doctors,nurses,and pharmaceutical workers.However,to actually realize the purpose,some details and indices still need to be adjusted.Meantime,it is of great necessity to strengthen monitoring,so as to truly reflect the achievement,responsibility and hazard of the community workers.
出处 《公共卫生与预防医学》 2011年第5期69-71,共3页 Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
关键词 社区卫生服务 绩效考核 Community health service Performance appraisal
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献27

共引文献104

同被引文献117

  • 1甄佩诗.澳门公共卫生服务绩效评估研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学.2008.
  • 2Glickman SW,Peterson ED.Innovative health reform models:Pay-for-performance initiatives[J].The America Journal of Managed Care,2009,15(10):300-304.
  • 3Petersen LA,Woodard LD,Urech T,et al.Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?[J].Annals of Internal Medicine,2006,154(4):265-272.
  • 4Rodriguez H,Elliott MN,Rogers WH,et al.The effect of performance-based financial incentives on improving patient care experiences:A statewide evaluation[J].Journal of General Internal Medicine,2009,12(24):1281-1288.
  • 5Berenson RA,Rich EC.US approaches to physician payment:The deconstruction of primary care[J].Journal of General Internal Medicine,2010,25(6):613-618.
  • 6Whalley D,Gravelle H,Sibbald B.Effect of the new contract on GPs working lives and perceptions of quality of care:A longitudinal survey[J].British Journal of General Practice,2008,58(546):8-14.
  • 7Rowe JW.Pay-for-performance and accountability:Related themes in improving health care[J].Annals of Internal Medicine,2006,145(9):695-699.
  • 8Grant S,Huby G,Watkins F,et al.The impact of pay-for-performance on professional boundaries in UK general practice:An ethnographic study[J].Sociology of Health & Illness,2009,31(2):229-245.
  • 9McDonald R,Harrison S,Checkland K,et al.Impact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care:Ethnographic study[J].British Medical Journal,2007,334(7608):1357-1359.
  • 10McDonald R,Checkland K,Harrison S,et al.Rethinking collegiality:Restratification in English general medical practice 2004-2008[J].Social Science & Medicine,2009,68(7):1199-1205.

引证文献6

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部