期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

英语学习者前缀派生词认知加工机制实验研究 被引量：4

An Empirical Study of Chinese EFL learners' processing of English prefixed derivational words
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用掩蔽启动技术探讨中国英语学习者前缀派生词的认知处理机制。实验采用2(外语水平:高水平和低水平)×3(启动条件:词素相关,词素无关和词素全同)的混合设计,因变量为反应时和错误率。结果表明:启动条件的主效应显著,外语水平的主效应显著,但这两者的交互作用未达到显著性水平。被试不能实现在线的分解加工,他们是以整词的形式将含re-前缀的派生词储存在大脑当中,并且这种加工机制独立于语言水平的影响。实验结果支持陈述—程序记忆模型和浅层结构假设。 Adopting masked priming technique,this study aims to investigate how Chinese EFL learners process English prefixed derivational words.In a mixed design of 2（English proficiency：high and low levels）×3（priming conditions：Morphologically related,Morphologically unrelated and Identity conditions）,RTs and error percentage are recorded as dependent variables.The results show main effects of group and priming condition,but no interaction of the two variables is found.The experiment indicates that Chinese EFL learners fail to decompose prefixed derivational words online,and they tend to memorize the whole unanalyzed words in their mental lexicon.This processing mechanism is observed not to be affected by their EFL proficiencies.The Declarative-Procedural Model and Shallow Structure Hypothesis are validated.
作者 魏大为
机构地区 兰州交通大学外国语学院
出处 《兰州交通大学学报》 CAS 2011年第5期125-129,共5页 Journal of Lanzhou Jiaotong University
关键词 掩蔽启动 分解 存储 masked priming decomposition storage
分类号 H313 [语言文字—英语]
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Pinker S. Words and rules: The ingredients of language[M]. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
  • 2Ullman, M T. The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grarnmar[J]. Journal of Psycholinguistie Research, 2001,30.. 37 -69.
  • 3Ullman, M T. A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition.. The declarative/procedural model[A]. In C. Sanz(Ed. ),Mind and context in adult second language ac- quisition: Methods, theory, and practice[C]. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press,2005. 141-178.
  • 4Clahsen H. Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisci- plinary study of German inflection[J]. Behavioral & Brain Sci- ences[J], 1999,22 (6) : 991-1060.
  • 5Rumelhart D E, & McClelland J I. On learning the past tenses of English verbs[A]. In: J L McClelland, D E Rumelhart,PDP Research Group ( Fds. ) Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the mierostructures of cognition [C]. Cam- bridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press, 1986. 216-271.
  • 6Ellis N, & R Sehmidt Morphology and longer distance depend- encies:Laboratory research illuminating the A in SLA[J]. Studies in Second l~nguage Acquisition, 1997,19: 145-171.
  • 7Birdsong D, & Flege J E. Regular-irregular dissociations in the acquisition of English as a second language[A]. In: BUCLD25:Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University confer- ence on language development[C]. Boston: Cascadilla Press. 2001.
  • 8常辉,郑丽娜.二语动词规则形式与不规则形式的大脑表征研究[J].现代外语,2008,31(4):415-422. 被引量：9
  • 9Bowden H W,Gelfand M P,Sanz C, & Ullman M T. Verbal in- flectional morphology in L1 and L2 Spanish: A frequency effects study examining storage versus composition[J]. Lan- guage Learning, 2010,60 (1) : 44-87.
  • 10Clahsen H, & Neubauer K. Morphology, frequency, and the processing of derived words in native and non-native speakers [J]. Lingua, 2010,120,2627-2673.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Pinker, S. & A. Prince. 1988. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition [J]. Cognition 28: 73-193.
  • 2Pinker, S. & M. T. Ullman, 2002. The past and future of the past tense [J]. Trends in Cognitive Science 6 : 456-463.
  • 3Prasada, S. & S. Pinker. 1993. Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological pattems [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes 8: 1-56.
  • 4Rumelhart, D. E. & J. L. McClelland. 1986. On learning the past tenses of English verbs [A]. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart & the PDP Research Group (eds.). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructures of Cognition Vol. 2 [C]. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press, 216-271.
  • 5Ullman, M. T. 1999. Acceptability ratings for regular and irregular past tense forms. Evidence for a dual-system model of language from word frequency and phonological neighborhood effects [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes 14: 47- 67.
  • 6Beck, M-L. 1997. Regular verbs, past tense and frequency: Tracking down a potential source of NS/NNS competence differences [J]. Second Language Research 13 : 93-115.
  • 7Berko, J. 1958. The child's learning of English morphology [J]. Word 14:150 177.
  • 8Birdsong, D. & J. E. Flege. 2001. Regular-irregular dissociations in L2 acquisition of English morphology [A]. In A. H. -J. Do, L. Domlnguez & A. Johansen (eds.). Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development [ C ]. Boston, MA : Cascadilla Press, 123-132.
  • 9Brovetto, C. & M. T. Ullman. 2001. First vs. second language: A differential reliance on grammatical computations and lexical memory[P]. Poster presented at the 14th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. University of Pennsylvania.
  • 10Ellis, N. & R. Schmidt. 1997. Morphology and longer distance dependencies-research illuminating the A in SLA in Second Language Acquisition 19: Laboratory [ J ]. Studies 145-171.

共引文献8

同被引文献62

  • 1黄远振.词的形态理据与词汇习得的相关性[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(6):430-435. 被引量：105
  • 2王文斌.英语词汇中的屈折词与派生词[J].外语教学,2002,23(1):55-58. 被引量：15
  • 3崔艳嫣,王同顺.基于CLEC的中国学习者英语派生词缀习得分析[J].国外外语教学,2005(2):5-11. 被引量：24
  • 4陈士法,苗兴伟,方洁.英汉双语心理词典中英语单词的存储单位——一项实验研究[J].外语教学与研究,2007,39(1):51-55. 被引量：38
  • 5Bick, A.S., R. Frost & G. Goelman. Imaging implicit morphological processing: Evidence from Hebrew [ J ]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2010, 22 (9) : 1955-1969.
  • 6Clahsen, H. & K. Neubauer. Morphology, frequency, and the processing of derived words in native and non-n- ative speakers [J]. Lingua, 2010, 120 (11): 2627-2637.
  • 7Coeh, D., J. Bares & A. Landers. ERPs and morphological processing: The N400 and semantic composition [J]. Cognitive , Affeetive & Behavioral Neuroscienee , 2013, 13 (2): 355-370.
  • 8Hank, O. & F. PulvermtiUer. Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential [ J ]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2004, 115 (5) : 1090-1103.
  • 9Lavric, A., A. Clapp & K. Rastle. ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked prim- ing study [J]. Journal ofCognith)e Neuroscierwe, 2007, 19 (5) : 866-877.
  • 10Morris, J., J. H. Porter, J. Grainger & P. J. Holeomb. Effects of lexieal status and morphological complexity in masked priming: An ERP study [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2011, 26 (4-6) : 558-599.

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

兰州交通大学学报
2011年 第5期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部