期刊文献+

肝动脉灌注结合全身化疗治疗进展期肝内胆管细胞癌的效果观察 被引量:2

Effect of hepatic artery infusion combined with systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估肝动脉灌注结合全身化疗治疗进展期肝内胆管细胞癌的疗效。方法:将41例肝内胆管细胞癌患者按治疗方法不同分为灌注组和单纯化疗组。灌注组22例经肝动脉灌注5-Fu和顺铂,同时给予吉西他滨静脉滴注;单纯化疗组19例给予吉西他滨和顺铂静脉滴注。对比分析两组疗效。结果:灌注组CR 1例,PR 7例,SD 9例,有效率38.0%,获益率80.9%;单纯化疗组无CR患者,PR 5例,SD 5例,有效率26.3%,获益率52.6%。两组获益率间差异有统计学意义(P=0.036)。灌注组Ⅱ度骨髓抑制率为31.8%(6/22),与单纯化疗组63.2%(12/19)相比,差异有统计学意义(χ2=84.35,P=0.021)。两组中位生存时间分别为15.6月和10.9月,经Log-rank检验,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:肝动脉灌注加全身化疗对晚期肝内胆管细胞癌有较好的疗效,且不良反应较少,可作为此类患者的治疗选择。 Objective: To evaluate the effect of hepatic artery infusion combined with systemic chemotherapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ICC) patients.Methods: Forty-one cases with advanced ICC were divided into group hepatic artery infusion(HAI) and group GP,which had been taken treatment of HAI+gemcitabine(GEM) or GP chemotherapy respectively.Results: In group HAI+GEM,complete response(CR) was 1 case,partial response(PR) was 7 cases,and stable disease(SD) was 9 cases.Meanwhile,ORR was 38.0% and CBR was 80.9%.In group GP,there was no CR,and PR was 5 cases,SD was 5 cases,ORR was 26.3%,and CBR was 52.6%.There was significant different of CBR between the two groups.There was a significantly lower rate of Grade 2 bone marrow suppression in the group HAI+GEM(31.8%),compared with the GP group 63.2%,and median overall survival time was 15.6 months and 10.9 months respectively with a statistically difference(P0.05).Conclusion: There was better efficacy and lower side effect of the treatment with advanced cholangiocarcinoma and HAI+GEM chemotherapy,so the comprehensive treatment can be used for these patients.
出处 《江苏大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2011年第5期439-442,共4页 Journal of Jiangsu University:Medicine Edition
关键词 肝内胆管细胞癌 肝动脉灌注 化疗 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy systemic chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献8

  • 1Ozkan H,Kaya M,Cengiz A.Comparison of tumor marker CA 242 with CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in pancreatic cancer.Hepatogastroenterology,2003,50:1669-1674.
  • 2Chen CY,Shiesh SC,Tsao HC,et al.The assessment of biliary CA 125,CA 19-9 and CEA in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma--the influence of sampling time and hepatolithiasis.Hepatogastroenterology,2002,49:616-620.
  • 3Ramage JK,Donaghy A,Farrant JM,et al.Serum tumor markers for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis.Gastroenterology,1995,108:865-869.
  • 4Uenishi T,Kubo S,Hirohashi K,et al.Cytokeratin-19 fragments in serum (CYFRA 21-1) as a marker in primary liver cancer.Br J Cancer,2003,88:1894-1899.
  • 5Tangkijvanich P,Thong-ngam D,Theamboonlers A,et al.Diagnostic role of serum interleukin 6 and CA 19-9 in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.Hepatogastroenterology,2004,51:15-19.
  • 6Torzilli G,Makuuchi M,Ferrero A,et al.Accuracy of the preoperative determination of tumor markers in the differentiation of liver mass lesions in surgical patients.Hepatogastroenterology,2002,49:740-745.
  • 7WANG Wen Liang, GU Guang Yu and HU Min.Expression and significance of HBV genes and their antigens in human primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,1998,4(5):29-33. 被引量:25
  • 8杨秉辉,夏景林.原发性肝癌的临床诊断与分期标准[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2001,9(6):324-324. 被引量:1014

共引文献49

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部