期刊文献+

艾司西酞普兰与文拉法辛缓释片治疗抑郁症的对照研究 被引量:1

Comparison of efficacy and safety between Eseitalopram and Venlafaxin in the treatment of depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨艾司西酞普兰与文拉法辛缓释片治疗抑郁症的效果和安全性。方法:60例抑郁症患者随机分为艾司西酞普兰组和文拉法辛缓释片组,分别给予艾司西酞普兰10~20 mg/d,文拉法辛缓释片75~225 mg/d,治疗6周。疗效采用Hamilton抑郁量表(HAMD)减分率评定,不良反应和安全性用副反应量表(TESS)和实验室检查评定。结果:艾司西酞普兰组有效率90.0%,治愈率36.7%;文拉法辛缓释片组有效率86.7%,治愈率40.0%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>O.05)。艾司西酞普兰主要不良反应为恶心、口干、困倦、头晕等,与文拉法辛缓释片差异无统计学意义(P>O.05)。结论:艾司西酞普兰治疗抑郁症患者安全有效,疗效和不良反应与文拉法辛缓释片相似。 Objective: To study the efficacy and safety of escitalopram and venlafaxin in the treatment of depression.Method: This was a randomized,open-label,6-week flexible dose study.Sixty patients diagnosed.as depression based on criteria were randomly assigned to escitalopram group treated with escitalopram 10~20 mg per day or venlafaxin group with venlafaxin sustained-release tablets 75~225 mg per day.Clinical effectiveness was evaluated with HAMD,and adverse reactions and safety were assessed with TESS and laboratory examina tion.Results: The response rate and remission rate were 90.0% and 36.7% in escitalopram group and were 86.7% and 40.0%in venlafaxin group respectively,without significant differences between two groups for both rates.The main adverse reactions were lack of appetite,nausea,dry mouth and dizziness in both groups.There were no significant differences between two groups.Conclusion: Escitalopram could be demonstrated as effective and tolerable as venlafaxin.
出处 《南通大学学报(医学版)》 2011年第5期350-352,共3页 Journal of Nantong University(Medical sciences)
关键词 艾司西酞普兰 文拉法辛缓释片 抑郁症 疗效 副作用 Escitalopram Venlafaxin depression efficacy safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献19

  • 1袁勇贵,张石宁.文拉法辛对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗无效的抑郁症患者的疗效[J].中华精神科杂志,2005,38(1):27-29. 被引量:37
  • 2周梦煜.文拉法辛缓释剂与氟西汀治疗抑郁症对照研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2006,16(3):178-178. 被引量:2
  • 3Bougerol T,Scotto JC,Patris M,et al.Citalopram and fluoxetine in major depression-comparison of two clinical trials in a psychiatrist setting and in general practice[J].Clin Drug Investigation,1997,14:77-89.
  • 4Stahl SM.Placebo-controlled comparison of the selective serotonin re-uptake in higitors citalopram and sertraline[J].Biol Psychiatry,2000,48:894-901.
  • 5Noble S,Benfield P.Citalopram:a review of its pharmacology,clinical efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of depression[J].CNS Drugs,1997,8:410-431.
  • 6Kennedy SH, Andersen HF, Lam RW. Efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder compared with conventional selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine XR:a meta-analysis[ J]. Psychiatry Neurosci,2006,31:122-131.
  • 7Sanchez C, Bergqvist PB, Brennum LT, et al. Escitalopram, the S ( + ) enantiomer of citalopram,is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with potent effects in animal models predictive of antidepressant and anxiolytie activities [ J ]. Psychopharmacology ( Bed ), 2003,167:353-362.
  • 8Holliday SM, Benfield P. Venlafaxine: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in depression [ J]. Drugs, 1995,45:280 - 294.
  • 9陈宝东.博乐欣治疗脑血管病并发抑郁症的疗效观察.华西药学杂志,2000,15(5):359-359.
  • 10Olvern RL. An open trial of venlafaxine in the treatment of attention - deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents[J]. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol, 1996,6:241.

共引文献141

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部