期刊文献+

情感幸福感的测量 被引量:13

Measuring Affective Well-being
下载PDF
导出
摘要 幸福感作为个体最求的终极目标和政府制定公共政策的出发点,引起了不同领域研究者的共同关注。情感幸福感是主观幸福感的情感成分,同时也是幸福感认知判断的信息来源。要推动情感幸福感研究的进一步发展,就必须为其奠定坚实的测量基础。本研究对情感幸福感测量研究的成果进行了梳理和分析,并展望了未来研究的发展方向。 As the ultimate goal of individuals' behaviors and the starting point of governments' public policies, well-being has attracted much attention of the researchers in various fields. Affective well-being is the affective component of subjective well-being, and it is also the important information source of the cognitive well-being. The development of the research on affective well-being has to be based on effective measurement. This article reviewed the studies on measurement of affective well-being, and prospected the future research.
作者 邱林
出处 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期137-142,160,共6页 Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划2009年度项目(090-14) 华南理工大学社会科学青年基金项目(2009) 华南理工大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2009ZM0147)
关键词 积极情感 消极情感 测量 positive affect negative affect measurement
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1E. Diener,S. Oishi, R. E. Lucas. Personality, Culture, and Subjective Well - being: Emotional and Cognitive E- valuations of Life. Annual Review of Psychology, 2003, 54 ( 1 ) : 403 - 425.
  • 2D. Kahneman. Objective Happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well- being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, NewYork: 1999 : 3 - 25.
  • 3U. Schimmack, E. Diener, S. Oishi. Life Satisfaction is a Momentary Judgment and a Stable Personality Character-istic: The Use of Chronically Accessible and Stable Sources. Journal of Personality, 2002, 70 ( 3 ) : 345 - 385.
  • 4B. E. Egloff, S. C. Schmukle, L. R. Burns. Facets of Dy- namic Positive Affect : Differentiating Joy, Interest, and Activation in The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85 (3) : 528 - 540.
  • 5J. M. Zelenski, R. J. Larsen. The Distribution of Basic E- motions in Everyday Life: A State and Trait Perspective from Experience Sampling Data. Journal of Research inPersonality, 2000, 34(2) : 178 - 197.
  • 6D. Watson, J. Vaidya. Mood Measurement : Current Status and Future Directions. In J. A. Schinka & W. Velicer(Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology. Vol- ume 2: Research Methods. New York: Wiley,2003: 351. - 375.
  • 7F. L. Barrett, J. A. Russell. The Structure of Current Af- fect: Corffroversies and Emerging Consensus. Current Di- rections in Psychological Science, 1999, 8( 1 ) : 10 - 14.
  • 8R. Reisenzein. Pleasure - arousal Theory and the Intensity of Emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychol- ogy, 1994, 67(3): 525-539.
  • 9D. Watson, L. A Clark, A. Tellegen. Development and Val- idation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 1988. 54(6): 1063-1070.
  • 10E. Diener, E. M. Suh, R. E. Lucas, et al. Subjective Well -being: Three Decades of Progress. Psychological Bul- letin, 1999, 125(2): 276-302.

二级参考文献48

共引文献1083

同被引文献325

引证文献13

二级引证文献160

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部