期刊文献+

语用标记语still的语用特征和功能 被引量:3

Pragmatic Features and Functions of the Pragmatic Marker STILL
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以英语still为研究对象,探讨其作为语用标记语的语用特征和语用功能。从语料分析中发现s,till作为语用标记语在话语中的位置并不总是位于句首,经常出现在句子中间;still不具有命题的真值条件意义,没有概念意义,而具有程序性意义;still不仅具有表对照的语用功能,还具有转折和让步的功能,表说话人的主观态度,以及表时间和情状的持续和增量等功能。 This paper focuses on an observation of the pragmatic features and functions of the English tion, but enjoys procedural meaning. Concerning its pragmatic function, STILL not only acts as a contrastive marker, it can also express reversion and concession, explicating speaker' s attitude, such as sympathy, persuasion, and blaming, as well as indicating time lasting and situation increment.
作者 段钨金
出处 《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2011年第5期106-111,共6页 Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)
基金 全国教育科学"十一五"规划2010年度教育部重点课题(GPA105037) 北京外国语大学第五批中国外语教育基金项目(ZGWYJYJJ2010A09)
关键词 认知语用学 语用标记语 STILL 语用特征和功能 cognitive pragmatics pragmatic markers still pragmatic features and functions
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1WILSON D, SPERBER D. Linguistic Form and Relevance [J]. Lingua, 1993 (90) : 1 -25.
  • 2SPERBER D, WILSON D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition [ M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2001.
  • 3BLAKEMORE D. The Organization of Discourse~ M]//NEWMEYER F J. Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  • 4BLAKEMORE D. Are Apposition Markers Discourse Markers [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1996 (32) :325 -347.
  • 5BLAKEMORE D. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: the Semantics and Pragnmtics of Discourse Markers [ M ]. New York : Cambridge Universi- ty, 2002.
  • 6FRASER B. Pragmatic Formatives[ M]//VERSCHUEREN J, BERTUCCELLI-PAPI M. The Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1987 : 179 - 192.
  • 7FRASER B. An Approach to Discourse Markers ~J]. Journal of Pragmaties, 1990 (14) :383 -395.
  • 8FRASER B. Pragmatic Markers [ J ]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1996, 6 (2) : 167 - 190.
  • 9IFANTIDOU-TROUKI E. Sentential Adverbs and Relevance [J ]. Lingua, 1993 (90) : 90 - 96.
  • 10IFANTIDOU-TROUKI E. Evidentials and Relevance [ M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001.

二级参考文献48

  • 1蒋琪,金立鑫.“再”与“还”重复义的比较研究[J].中国语文,1997(3):187-191. 被引量:37
  • 2沈家煊.“好不”不对称用法的语义和语用解释[J].中国语文,1994(4):262-265. 被引量:79
  • 3沈家煊.“语用否定”考察[J].中国语文,1993,(5):321-331.
  • 4Blakemore, D. The organization of discourse[A]. E J. Newmeyer. Linguistics: The Cambridge University Press[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. VoI.IV: 229-250.
  • 5Blakemore, D. Are apposition markers discourse markers[J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1996, (32):325-347.
  • 6Blass, R. Relevance Relations in Discourse: A Study with Special Reference to Sissala[C].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • 7Brown, P. & S, Levinson. Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena[A], Ester N. Goody.Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978. 56-289.
  • 8Fraser, Bruce. Conversational mitigation[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1980, (4): 341-350.
  • 9Jucker, Andreas H. The discourse marker Well: A relevant-theoretical account[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1993, (19): 435-452.
  • 10Lakoff, R. Questionable answers and answerable questions[A]. B. B. Kachru, et al. Issues in Linguistics[C]. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1973. 453-467.

共引文献1146

同被引文献29

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部