摘要
目的:分析癌症疲乏量表(CFS)中文版的信度和效度。方法:通过正向翻译、综合、回译、专家评议和预调查5个步骤对CFS进行跨文化调适,修订成中文版。采用方便取样,对187名癌症患者施测CFS中文版进行项目分析、内部一致性检验、探索性因素分析和癌因性疲乏总体状况分析。1周后对其中42名患者重测CFS中文版,评价重测信度。结果:量表共15个条目,包括躯体、情感和认知3个维度。各维度与总量表的内部一致性Cronbachα系数在0.63~0.86,重测信度为0.55~0.77。探索性因素分析得到3个因素,共解释了59.04%的累计方差贡献率,各条目载荷均>0.40。结论:癌症疲乏量表中文版具有较好的信度和效度,符合心理测量学要求。
Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS). Methods: After the translation, synthesis, back translation, expert committee review, and pretesting processes, the CFS was revised into a Chinese version (CFS-C). Totally 200 Chinese cancer patients completed CFS-C initally and 42 of them were investigated a week later to evaluate the test-retest reliability. Results: The CFS-C comprised 15 items and reflected 3 dimentions of physical, emotional and cognitive fatigue. The internal consistency reliability evaluated by Cronbach'a was 0.63 -0. 86 for the three subscales and the whole scale. The test-retest reliability was from 0. 55 to 0. 77. Factor analysis displayed good construction of the CFS-C. Conclusion: The Chinese version of Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS) has good reliability and validity, meeting psychometric criteria.
出处
《中国心理卫生杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第11期810-813,共4页
Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词
癌因性疲乏
信度
效度
心理测量学
cancer-related fatigue
reliability
validity
psychometrics