期刊文献+

不同人群对违法精神病人的处置意见 被引量:4

Disposal attitudes towards forensic patients of different types of respondents
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解不同群体对违法精神病人的处置意见。方法:使用自编违法精神病人处置意见调查表,选择普通人群、精神病人家属、精神科医生和公安警察4组人群为调查对象,通过现场调查和信访调查的方式收集调查表。结果:四组人群中,94%~98%认为精神病人是可治疗的,70.4%~94.2%认为精神病人的暴力危险性高于普通人群,公安警察态度认同率明显高于精神病人家属。在"如何处置无责任能力的精神病人"问题上,"由政府建立专门机构(如安康医院)监禁治疗"在4组中态度认同率最高,其次为"家属强制送精神病院治疗"。在"违法精神病人责任能力的最终裁决应由谁决定"问题上,"由司法精神病鉴定医生裁决"在4组中态度认同率最高,其次为"法官",其中仅38.0%的公安警察认同由法官决定。结论:本研究发现人们已经普遍认识到社会对精神病人存在偏见,但对相应法律知识仍较缺乏。目前国内对违法精神病人的处置现状仍不容乐观,因此有必要积极推动立法,规范违法精神病人处置措施,同时加强宣传和普及相关法律知识。 Objective: To understand the disposal attitudes towards forensic patients in different types of population. Methods: Four group of population were selected, including general population ( n = 65), family members of patients with mental illness (n = 54), psychiatrists (n = 50), and polices (n = 52). They were asked to finish a self-made questionnaire of disposal attitudes towards forensic patients by interview or by email. Result: In four groups, 94% - 98% of respondents thought patients with mental disorder could be treated; 70.4% - 94. 2% thought patients were more violent than general population, and the proportion was higher in police group than in family members group (P = 0. 001 ). For the question of "how we should dispose those offenders found no guilty by reason of insanity", most of respondents in the four groups were more in favor of "imprisoning and treating them in the institute administered by government such as Ankang Hospital (82. 1%, 75.5%, 78.0%, and 94. 1% ), then " forcibly sending the offenders to mental health institutes". When asked "who has the adjudication to criminals with mental illness", respondents in four groups were more in favor of "the rights should belong to forensic psychiatrists (80. 6%, 94. 2%, 78.0%, 90. 0% ), then "the judge". Meanwhile, only 38.0% of polices thought that the rights should belong to judge, which is lower than general population significantly (P = 0. 001). Conclusion: This study suggests that the public have gradually recognized the social prejudice on patients with mental disorder. However, they still know little about the rules and regulations. The situation of disposal methods on forensic patients is not optimistic. So it is necessary to promote legislation, reinforce popularizing related legal knowledge, and implement feasible methods on disposing forensic patients.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期846-850,共5页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 全国司法行政系统理论研究规划课题(10GH2029)
关键词 违法精神病人 处置意见 调查问卷 forensic patients disposal attitude questionnaire
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献27

  • 1程志让,高欢,张翔,唐卓如,陆亚文,杨卫群,蔡钽,胡赤怡,李红,李映萍,张宇平,黄秀珍.深圳市精神疾病流行学及精神卫生服务现状调查[J].中国民康医学,1999,0(1):34-37. 被引量:21
  • 2卢小勇,陈贺龙,胡斌,陈宪生,邹国华,周平良,李正春,吴书华,匡奕华,刘平,刘增裕,陈点火,刘快发,周国治,李春芳,朱安雄.江西省精神分裂症患病率流行病学调查[J].上海精神医学,2004,16(4):234-236. 被引量:13
  • 3林丁盛,郭永松,齐朝阳,吴丽霞.社区人群对精神病人关爱态度的调查[J].医学与社会,2004,17(5):7-9. 被引量:24
  • 4石其昌,章健民,徐方忠,费立鹏,许毅,傅永利,顾卫,周夏江,王淑敏,张滢,俞敏.浙江省15岁及以上人群精神疾病流行病学调查[J].中华预防医学杂志,2005,39(4):229-236. 被引量:298
  • 5向孟泽.12地区神经症流行学调查[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1986,19(2):87-87.
  • 6沈渔村.各类精神病患病率调查资料总讨论[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1986,19:80-80.
  • 7赵忠亚.其他精神病流行学调查资料分析[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1986,19:77-77.
  • 8涂健 宁佐喜 沈渔屯阝 等.中国七个地区脑血管病所致精神障碍和酒、药依赖流行病学调查.中华精神科杂志,1998,31(2):107-107.
  • 9Fazel S, Langstom N, Hjern A, et al. Violence in schizophrenia rare in the absence of substance abuse. JAMA. 2009 301 (19) : 2016-2023.
  • 1012地区精神疾病流行学调查协作组.国内12地区精神疾病流行学调查的方法学及资料分析[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1986,19(1):65-65.

共引文献119

同被引文献89

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部