期刊文献+

Gleason 10分前列腺癌患者的临床特点分析 被引量:3

Clinical characteristic of Gleason 10 prostate cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察Gleason 10分前列腺癌患者的临床诊疗及疾病变化过程,总结该类前列腺癌患者的临床特点及预后影响因素。方法2005年1月至2010年5月,21例初诊为前列腺癌、Gleason 10分、行手术去势加抗雄激素治疗的患者纳入本研究。初诊年龄56~85岁,平均73岁。PSA8.9~261.0.g/ml,平均60.8ng/ml,其中6例PSA≤20ng/ml。行核素骨扫描发现骨转移16例。予双侧睾丸切除术加氟他胺或比卡鲁胺全雄激素阻断治疗。术后1个月复查PSA,以后每3个月随访PSA。治疗后6个月为单纯内分泌治疗观察终点。6个月内PSA未降至〈4ng/ml且无远处转移者加用局部外放射治疗,伴骨转移者使用基于多西他赛与泼尼松的全身化疗。患者死亡为研究终点。结果15例初诊PSA〉20ng/ml患者中,5例治疗后6个月内血清PSA未降至正常水平,其中4例伴骨转移。该4例予全身化疗后PSA均未降至正常水平,3例1年内死亡,1例诊断后19个月死亡,1例疾病局限患者予外放射治疗,PSA下降至正常水平8个月后出现肿瘤进展,诊断后11个月死亡。10例治疗后6个月内血清PSA降至正常水平,其中3例分别于诊断后第19、28、36个月死于肿瘤,7例存活。6例初诊时PSA≤2.0ng/ml患者中3例治疗后6个月内PSA未降至正常水平,其中2例伴骨转移予化疗后于1年内死亡;1例PSA下降至正常水平但仍出现肿瘤进展,全身多发骨转移,化疗无效,1年内死亡;1例4年后因前列腺癌死亡;1例随访6个月,PSA降至0.07ng/ml。结论Gleason 10分前列腺癌肿瘤进展迅速,抗雄激素治疗疗效不佳,行全雄激素阻断后6个月内PSA无法下降至正常水平患者病情进展凶险。初诊PSA≤20ng/ml且病理证实Gleason 10分者可能预示预后不佳。 Objective To observe the clinical characteristic and treatment response of the Gleason 5 + 5 prostate cancer and to summarize the prognostic factor of such patients. Methods From January 2005 to May 2010, 21 cases of Gleason 5 + 5 prostate cancer were enrolled in this study. The average age was 73 years and the pre-treatment PSA was 60.8 ng/ml. Six of the 21 cases had a PSA level≤20 ng/ml. The maximal androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the form of castration and Casodex or fluetamide was carried out once the diagnosis was made. Bone metastasis was revealed in 16 cases. PSA levels were tested at the 4th month and then every 3 months after the castration. The observation endpoint was 6 months. Extracorporeal beam irradiation or the systemic chemotherapy was carried out if the PSA did not drop to a nor- mal range after 6 months. Results In the study group with initial PSA 〉 20 ng/ml, the PSA did not drop to normal range in 5 cases ; of which 4 had bone metastasis. With systemic chemotherapy, 3 cases died within 1 year. Another case, with localized disease, received an extracorporeal beam irradiation and died within 1 year due to progression of the tumor. Among the remaining 10 cases sensitive to total androgen blockage, 7 survived through the end of the study period. One case had PSA recurrence in month seven after the initialtherapy and died at month 19. One case had PSA recurrence at month 22 and died at month 36. The patient had his PSA augmented at month 24 after total androgen blockage and the patient passed away 4 months later. Of the 6 cases who had an initial PSA ≤20 ng/ml 4 died within one year. Conclusions Gleason 5 + 5 prostate cancer is relatively resistant to ADT with a worse prognosis, especially for the cases with a nadir PSA 〉 4 ng/ml after 6 months' ADT. The patients who had an initial PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml might have an unsatisfactory clinical outcome.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期785-788,共4页 Chinese Journal of Urology
基金 国家自然科学基金(91129725)
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 前列腺特异抗原 全雄激素阻断 疗效结果 Prostatic neoplasms Carcinoma Prostate-specific antigen maximal androgendeprivation Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1D' Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowiez SB, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostateetomy, external beam radiation the- rapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized pros- tate cancer. JAMA, 1998, 280: 969-974.
  • 2Magheli A, Rais Bahrami S, Peck JH, et al. Importance of tu- mot location in patients with high preoperative prostate specific antigen levels( greater than 20 ng/ml) treated with radical prosta- tectomy,J Urol,2007,178:1311-1315.
  • 3李鸣.前列腺癌诊断治疗指南.见:那彦群,孙光主编.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009,48-49.
  • 4Gleason DF, Melliger GT. Prediction of prognosis for prostate ad- enocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical stag- ing. J Urol, 2002, 167: 953-958.
  • 5Bostwick DG. Gleason grading of prostatic needle biopsies. Cor- relation with grade in 316 matched prostatectomies. Am J Surg Pathol, 1994, 18 : 796-803.
  • 6Patel AA, Chen M, Renshaw AA, et al. PSA failure following definitive treatment of prostate cancer having biopsy Gleason score 7 with tertiary grade 5. JAMA, 2007, 298 : 1533-1538.
  • 7Whittemore DE, Hick EJ, Carter MR, et al. Significance of ter- tiary Gleason 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy speci- mens. JUrol, 2008, 179: 516-522.
  • 8Nanda A, Chen MH, Renshaw AA, et al. Gleason pattern 5 prostate cancer: future stratification of patients with high risk di- sease and implication for future randomized trails. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009, 74: 1419-1423.
  • 9Grossfe|d GD, Latini DM, Lubeck DP, et al. Predicting disease recurrence in intermediate and high-risk patients undergoing radi- cal prostateetomy using percent positive biopsies: results from CaPSURE. Urology, 2002, 59: 560-565.
  • 10Sylvester JE, Blasko JC, Grimm PD, et al. Ten-year biochemical relapse-free survival after external beam radiation and brachythe- rapy for localized prostate cancer: the Seattle experience. Int J Radial Oncol Biol Phys, 2003, 57: 944-952.

二级参考文献22

  • 12004年上海市市区恶性肿瘤发病率[J].肿瘤,2007,27(7):594-594. 被引量:23
  • 2Peyromaure M, Debre B, Mao K, et al. Management of prostate cancer in China: a multieenter report of 6 institutions. J Urol, 2005, 174: 1794-1797.
  • 3Benaim EA, Pace CM, Roehrbor CG. Gleason score predicts androgen independent progression after androgen deprivation therapy. Eur Urol, 2002, 42:12-17.
  • 4Benaim EA, Pace CM, Lam PM, et al. Nadir PSA as a progression to androgen independent prostate cancer. Urology, 2002, 59: 73-79.
  • 5Mulders PF, Fernandez del MP, Theeuwes AG, et al. Value of biochemical markers in the management of disseminated prostatic cancer. Eur Urol, 1992, 21: 2-8.
  • 6Daver A, Soret JY, Coblentz Y, et al. The usefulness of prostatespecific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase in clinical practice. Am J Clin Oncol, 1988, 11(Suppl) :53-58.
  • 7Lee YK, Kang KJ, Chong CH, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Kor J Urol, 2000, 41: 205-210.
  • 8Andrew JA, Elizabeth SG, Yi-Chun Ou Yang, et al. A contemporary prognostic nomogram for men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: A TAX327 study analysis. Clin Cancer Res, 2007, 13: 6396-6403.
  • 9American Society of Clinical Oncology Recommendations for Initial hormornal Management of Androgen sensitive Meta static Recurrent, or Progressive Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22: 2927-2941.
  • 10Saitoh H, Hida M, Shimbo T, et al. Metastatic patterns of prostatic cancer. Correlation between sites and number of or gans involved. Cancer, 1984, 54:3078-3084.

共引文献16

同被引文献49

  • 1Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61 : 69-90.
  • 2Kattan MW. Nomograms are superior to staging and risk grouping systems for identifying high-risk patients : preoperative application in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol, 2003, 13: 111-116.
  • 3Cooperberg RM, Cowan J, Broering M J, et al. High risk prostate cancer in the United States, 1990 -2007. World J Urol, 2008, 26: 211-218.
  • 4Peyromaure M, Debre B, Mao K, et al. Management of prostate cancer in China: a multicenter report of 6 institutions. J Urol, 2005, 174: 1794-1797.
  • 5D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA, 1998, 280: 969-974.
  • 6Scardino P. Update: NCCN prostate cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2005, 3 (Suppl 1) : S29-33.
  • 7Yossepowitch O, Eggener SE, Serio AM, et al. Secondary therapy, metastatic progression, and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol, 2008, 53 : 950-959.
  • 8Spahn M, Joniau S, Gontero P, et al. Outcome predictors of radical prostateetomy in patients with prostate-specific antigen greater than 20 ng/ml: a European multi-institutional study of 712 patients. Eur Urol, 2010, 58: 1-7.
  • 9Stephenson A J, Kattan MW, Eastham JA, et al. Prostate cancerspecific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27 : 4300- 4305.
  • 10Lughezzani G, Gallina A, Larcher A, et al. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen- confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer [J/ OL]. BJU Int, 2012 [2012-05-07]. http://onlinelibrary, wiley. com/doi/10.1111/j. 1464-410X. 2012. 11114. x/full[published online ahead of print April 4, 2012].

引证文献3

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部