期刊文献+

抑制性进言与企业绩效:不同类型冲突的中介效果 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 抑制性进言是制定和实施科学决策的宝贵资源。进言提出后要转化为现实绩效,还取决于对进言产生的冲突的管理有效性。本文旨在考察抑制性进言在什么样的内部冲突过程中更可能产生高绩效,以明确三种冲突类型的调节作用。研究发现,抑制性进言确实对企业绩效具有显著的正向影响,更多反面或修正意见可提高前期决策的科学性;合作式冲突和对抗式冲突都会显著正向调节抑制性进言与企业绩效的关系,进一步放大抑制性进言的积极作用,更高效地转化为绩效;让步式冲突是一种消极的冲突类型,其对抑制性进言与企业绩效的关系具有负向调节作用。
作者 郭骁
出处 《学习与实践》 CSSCI 2011年第11期104-110,共7页 Study and Practice
基金 国家社科基金一般项目资助(批准号:10GBL041) 中央财经大学“中财121人才工程青年博士发展基金”资助(批准号:QB-JGL201013),中央财经大学“211工程”三期资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1魏昕,张志学.组织中为什么缺乏抑制性进言?[J].管理世界,2010,26(10):99-109. 被引量:121
  • 2李子奈,齐良书.关于计量经济学模型方法的思考[J].中国社会科学,2010(2):69-83. 被引量:93
  • 3Barker,J,Tjosvold,D,Andrews,I.R.Conflict Ap-proaches of Effective and Ineffective Managers:A FieldStudy in a Matrix Organization. Journal of ManagementStudies . 1988
  • 4Deutsch,M.Fifty Yearsof Conflict. Retrospections on So-cial Psychology . 1980
  • 5Deutsch,M.The Resolution of Conflict. . 1973
  • 6Detert,J.R,Burris,E.R.Leadership Behavior andEmployee Voice:Is the Door Really Open?. The Academy of Management Journal . 2007
  • 7Liang,J,Farh,J.L.Promotive and Prohibitive VoiceBehavior in Organizations:A Two-wave LongitudinalExamination. Biannual Meeting of International Asso-ciation for Chinese Management Research (IA CMR) . 2008
  • 8Deutsch,M.Sixty Years of Conflict. TheInternational Journal of Conflict Management . 1990
  • 9Blatt,R.Tough Love:How Communal Schemasand Contracting Practices Build Relational Capital inEntrepreneurial Teams. Academy of Management Re-view . 2009
  • 10Tjosvold,D.Cooperative and Competitive GoalApproach to Conflict:Accomplishments and Chal-lenges. Applied Psychology . 1998

二级参考文献66

  • 1洪永淼.计量经济学的地位、作用和局限[J].经济研究,2007,42(5):139-153. 被引量:130
  • 2Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H. and Magee, J. C., 2003, "From Power to Action", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.85, pp.453-486.
  • 3Gelfand, M. J. and McCusker, C., 2002, "Metaphor and the Cultural Construction of Negotiation: A Paradigm for Theory and Research", In M. Gannon and K. L. Newman (eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Management, Blackwell, pp.292-314.
  • 4Hirschman, A. 0., 1970, "Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Response to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States", Harvard University Press.
  • 5Hofstede, G. H., 1950, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage.
  • 6Huang, X., Van de Vliert, E. and Van der Vegt, G., 2005, "Breaking the Silence Culture: Stimulation of Participation and Employee Opinion withholding Cross-nationally", Management and Organization Review, Vol.1, pp.459-482.
  • 7Hwang, K. K., 2000, "Chinese Relationalism: Theoretical Construction and Methodological Considerations", Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, Vol.30, pp.155-178.
  • 8Kipnis, D., 1972, "Does Power Corrupt?" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 24, pp.33-41.
  • 9Kirkbride, P. S., Tang, S. and Westwood, R. I., 1991, "Chinese Conflict Preferences and Negotiation Behavior: Cultural and Psychological Influences", Organization Studies, Vol.12, pp. 365-386.
  • 10Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J. L., Chen, Z. X. and Lowe, K. B., 2009, "Individual power Distance Orientation and Follower Reactions to Transformational Leaders: A Cross-level, Cross-cultural Examination", Academy of Management Jounal, Vol.52, pp.744-764.

共引文献210

同被引文献47

  • 1曾德明,周青,秦吉波.高新技术企业R&D团队柔性冲突管理机制研究[J].管理评论,2005,17(2):22-26. 被引量:22
  • 2周青,毛崇峰.高新技术企业协作R&D网络冲突管理的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2007,19(2):7-13. 被引量:5
  • 3AUGUSTINE M, COOPER C D. Getting the most from strategic partnering:a tale of two alliances[J]. Organiza- tional Dynamics, 2009,38 (1) : 37-51.
  • 4JEHN K A. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and di- mensions in organizational groups[J]. Administrative Sci- ence Quarterly, 1997,42(3) : 530-557.
  • 5PANTELI N, SOCKALINGAM S. Trust and conflict within virtual inter-organizational alliances: a framework for facilitating knowledge sharing[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2005,39(4) : 599-617.
  • 6DAS T K,TENG B. The dynamics of alliance conditions in the alliance development proeess[J]. Journal of Man- agement Studies, 2002,39(5) : 725-746.
  • 7De DREU C K,WEINGART L R. Task versus rela- tionship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction:a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of applied Psy- chology,200a,88(4), 741.
  • 8JEHN K A,MANN1X E A. The dynamic nature of con- flict:a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44(2) :238-251.
  • 9FASSIN Y. The strategic rote of university-industry liai- son offices [J].Journal of Research Administration, 2000,1(2) :31-42.
  • 10HAM R M,MOWERY D C. Improving the effectiveness of public-private R&D collaboration:case studies at a US weapons laboratory[J]. Researeh Policy, 1998, 26 ( 6 ) : 661-675.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部