期刊文献+

重大创伤幸存者情绪自动加工对认知的影响 被引量:1

The influences of emotion on cognition in survivors after major trauma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究重大创伤幸存者情绪自动加工对其认知的影响。方法比较10名重大创伤幸存者在创伤后一个月内与10名健康对照者完成阈上和阈下情绪任务的行为学和脑电结果。结果在阈上任务中,当启动刺激为正性或负性情绪图片时,创伤组平均反应时间长于对照组;但两组间反应正确率无明显差异。ERPs结果显示,阈上任务中创伤组P2潜伏期明显长于对照组,波幅无明显差异。结论大多数个体在经历重大创伤后,随时间推移其情绪加工及认知判断均渐趋向正常,P2成分可能是判断个体是否完全恢复的一个敏感的指标。 Objective trauma survivors. Methods The aim of this study was to explore the influences of emotion on 10 survivors who experienced major trauma during one month and cognition in major 10 healthy controls were completed sub - threshold and supra - threshold emotion tasks, their behavior responses and electrophysiological data were recorded. Results Giving positive or negative emotion pictures as the priming stimulus, the average reaction time of survivors were longer than that of controls in supra - threshold emotion task, but the accuracy made no differences between the two groups. P2 latencies were prolonged in survivors, and P2 amplitudes had no significant differences between survivors and controls. Conclusions Emotion process and cognition judgment of most survivors are trending to normal after major trauma. P2 element is likely to be a sensitive marker to judge whether the individual recover completely.
出处 《国际精神病学杂志》 2011年第4期193-196,共4页 Journal Of International Psychiatry
基金 国家科技支撑计划(2007BAI17B02) 国家自然科学基金重点项目(30830046) 湖南省自然基金项目(10JJ6034)
关键词 创伤 情绪 认知 ERPS Trauma Emotion Cognition ERPs
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Freeman JB, Beck JG. Cognitive interference for trauma cues in sexually abused adolescent girls with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Child Psychol. 2000 ;29 (2) :245 - 256.
  • 2Mitchell DG, Richell RA, Leonard A, et al. Emotion at the expense of cognition: psychopathic individuals outperform controls on an operant response task. J Abnorm Psychol.2006;115(3) :559 -566.
  • 3Blair KS, Smith BW, Mitchell DG, et al. Modulation of emo- tion by cognition and cognition by emotion. Neuroimage, 2007;35(1) :430-440.
  • 4McNally RJ. Cognitive abnormalities in post -traumatic stress disorder. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 ; 10 (6) : 271 - 277.
  • 5Bar - Haim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, et al. Threat - related attentional bias in anxious and uonanxious individuals: a meta - analytic study. Psychol Bull. 2007 ; 133 ( 1 ) : 1 - 24.
  • 6Buckley TC, Galovski T, Blauchard EB, et al. Is the emo- tional Stroop paradigm sensitive to malingering? A between - groups study with professional actors and actual trauma survi- vors. J Trauma Stress, 2003 ;16( 1 ) :59 -66.
  • 7Vythilingam M, Blair KS, McCaffrey D, et al. Biased emo- tional attention in post - traumatic stress disorder: a help as well as a hindrance? Psychological Medicine, 2007 ;37(10) : 1445 - 1455.
  • 8Lang PJ , Greenwald MK (1988). The international affective picture system standardization procedure and initial group re- suits for Affective judgements. Technical reports 1A and lB. Center for research in psychophysiology, University of Flori- da: GainesviUe.

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部