期刊文献+

早期乳腺癌保乳手术与改良根治术的临床研究 被引量:13

Clinical research of breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy in the treatment of early breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨保乳手术与改良根治术治疗早期乳腺癌的临床效果。方法:将我院收治的96例早期乳腺癌患者随机分为两组,A组48例行保乳手术,B组48例行改良根治术,分析两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间及术后恢复情况。结果:A组手术时间、术中出血量及住院时间明显优于B组,分别为手术时间[(118.52±16.35)min vs(155.87±20.55)min],术中出血量[(105.26±42.15)ml vs(153.32±51.26)ml],住院时间[(10.15±2.56)d vs(14.38±3.27)d],组间差异均有高度统计学意义(t=9.85、3.55、7.06,均P<0.01);两组术后并发症发生率分别为2.08%、16.67%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.41,P<0.05);两组局部复发率、远处转移率、3年及5年生存率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论:保乳手术治疗早期乳腺癌疗效满意,值得推广应用。 Objective: To study the effect of breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy in treating early breast cancer. Methods: 96 cases with early breast cancer in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups, group A of 48 cases received breast-conserving surgery, group B of 48 cases received modified radical mastectomy, and the operation time, hemorrhage in operation, the length of hospital stay and the healing condition of the two groups were compared. Results: There were significant differences about the operation time [(118.52±16.35)min vs (155.87±20.55)mini, hemorrhage in operation [(105.26±42.15)ml vs (153.32±51.26)ml] and the length of hospital stay [(10.15±2.56)d vs (14.38±3.27)d] between two groups (t=9.85, 3.55, 7.06, all P〈0.01). There was significant differences about the rate of postoperative complications (2.08% vs 16.67%) between the two groups (χ2=4.41, P〈0.05). There were no significant difference in the relapse rate of part, distant transfusion rate, survival rate of 3 years and 5 years between two groups (all P〉0.05). Conclusion: The effect of breast conserving surgery in treating early breast cancer is satisfactory, so it is recommending for wide application.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2011年第32期37-38,共2页 China Medical Herald
关键词 早期乳腺癌 保乳手术 改良根治术 Early breast cancer Breast-conserving surgery Modified radical mastectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1刘君,方志沂,于泳,赵晶,郝希山.乳腺癌保乳手术安全范围的研究[J].中国肿瘤临床,2005,32(15):856-860. 被引量:36
  • 2刘阳,王立国.保乳手术治疗早期乳腺癌的临床分析[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(20):2411-2412. 被引量:28
  • 3张强,张斌,龙飞,李爽,王恩华,张万和.影响乳腺癌保乳手术切缘阳性多因素分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2006,26(12):963-964. 被引量:12
  • 4Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347(16) : 1227-1232.
  • 5Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of breast cancer [J ]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347(16) : 1233-1241.
  • 6Amanti C, Regolo L, Moscaroli A, et al. Total periareolar approach in breast con-serving surgery [ J ]. Tumori, 2003, 89 (4 Suppl) : 169-172.
  • 7Petit J Y, Garusi C. One hundred and eleven cases of breast conservation treatment with simultaneous reconstruction at the European Institute of Oncology (Milan) [J]. Tumori, 2002, 88 ( 1 ) :41-47.
  • 8Heller W, Mazhar D, Ward R, et al. Neoadjuvant 5-fluorouraeil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy followed by docetaxel in refractory patients with locally advanced breast cancer [J]. OncolRep, 2007, 17(1): 253-259.
  • 9Gonzalez-Angulo AM, blorales-Vasquez F, Hortobagyi GN. Overview of resistance to systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer[ J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2007, 608:1 -22.
  • 10van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial[ J]. Natl Cancer Inst, 2000, 92 (14) : 1143 - 1150.

共引文献181

同被引文献77

引证文献13

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部