期刊文献+

Web of Science与Google Scholar的引文分析比较研究 被引量:9

A Comparative Study on Web of Science Citations and Google Scholar Citations
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以图书情报领域期刊为研究样本,分别从引文数量、引文出版年、引文类型、引文语种和引文重合率几个方面对Web of Science和Google Scholar两个引文分析工具进行比较,并对Google Scholar的引文特征进行深入探讨,对二者分别作为引文分析工具的优劣势进行总结。 This article will take 5 journals in Library and Information as sample,and make a comparative analysis between Web of Science and Google Scholar from the citation counts,publishing year,citation type,citation language and citation overlaps,and then make further study about the Google Scholar unique citation.And at last make a comparison between Web of Science and Google Scholar separately functioning as the citation analysis tool.
作者 任静 孙建军
出处 《情报科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第11期1688-1692,共5页 Information Science
关键词 引文分析 Web of SCIENCE GOOGLE SCHOLAR citation analysis web of science google scholar
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Liwen Vaughan,Debora Shaw.A New Look at Evidence of Scholarly Citation in Citation Indexes and from Web Sources [J].Scientometrics,2008,74(2):317-330.
  • 2陶慧卿,潘卫,庄琦.从引文分析的角度比较Google Scholar与Web of Science的优势与不足[J].图书馆杂志,2008,27(12):29-35. 被引量:16
  • 3Association of Information System [EB/OL].http://home.aisnet. org/display common.cfm?an=3,2010.
  • 4Vaughan L, Shaw D. Bibliographic and Web citationshat is the difference[J]. Journal of the American Society for Infor- mation Science and Technology, 2003, 54(4): 13 ! 3-1324.
  • 5Mike Thelwall,Kayvan Kousha. How is Science Cited on the web--A Classification of Google Unique Web Citations[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2007,58(11): 1631-1644.
  • 6赵丹群.试论引文分析方法的网络化发展与应用[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(8):39-42. 被引量:8

二级参考文献18

共引文献22

同被引文献123

引证文献9

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部