期刊文献+

哈佛课程体系改革考论:以美育类课程为例——哈佛通识教育(美育类)实地考察报告之二 被引量:7

On Harvard General Education Curriculum Reform:A Case Study of Aesthetic Education Categories
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以领先世界的雄心和居安思危的警醒继承优秀传统,勇于自我否定,尊重批评意见,不断创新进取……是哈佛大学长盛不衰的保障之一。哈佛大学新课程改革既延续、回归传统,强调"自由教育"理念;又充分挖掘和利用校内资源。本轮课程改革不受浮躁的理论的干扰,尊重来自教、学第一线的改革意见,以道、器结合的境界,贡献了培养"世界公民"的"适应新世纪的课程体系"。美育类课程作为哈佛新课程体系的缩影,从以"学科"为分类标准,到以"需要"为分类标准;从重理论研究方法,到重审美对象"是什么"和"为什么","连接"大学院墙内外、学生现在和未来,实现了从艺术教育到审美教育的跨越,旨在让学生认识每个人都是各自伟大传统的创造者,又是伟大传统的创造物。 The new General Education (GE) curriculum reform of Harvard is the continuity of and the return to the tradition of liberal education as well as the product of the collective wisdom and experience of the staff and students. This reform is characterized by a combination of theory and practice, a highly respect for the suggestions and advices from professors and students. This paper takes the first two categories--Aesthetic and Interpretive Understanding, and Culture and Belief, as a case to reveal the changes of the new GE courses, i.e. from division by disciplines to the needs of reality ; from stressing theoretical research methods to "whats" and "whys" ; from art education to aesthetic education. Thus, the aim of the designers of the two categories is to make the students understand that they and others are both the products and the participants of the great traditions.
作者 王毅 傅晓微
出处 《美育学刊》 2011年第6期51-60,共10页 Journal of Aesthetic Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2007年度重大研究项目<中国高校艺术教育现状与发展趋势研究>(07JJD751080)的研究成果之一
关键词 回归传统 自我颠覆 艺术教育 审美教育 return to tradition self-criticism art education aesthetic education
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1王毅,傅晓微.哈佛通识教育委员会主席哈里斯访谈录——哈佛通识教育(美育类)实地考察报告之一[J].美育学刊,2011,2(5):31-43. 被引量:22
  • 2甘阳.大学通识教育的纲与目[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2007,18(2):1-6. 被引量:64
  • 3Welcoming Gen Ed:Harvard Forum Extols New General Education Requirements. http://news.harvard.edu/ga-zette/ . 2011
  • 4Opening Year Dialogue with President Faust and Char-lie Gibson. http://www.generaleducation.fas.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k37826&tabgroupid=icb.tabgroup87215 . 2011
  • 5Derek Curtis Bok.Our Underachieving Colleges:A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More. . 2008
  • 6Introduction to the Core Curriculum. http://my.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=core . 2011
  • 7Light,R. J. Making the Most of College: Students Speak Their Minds . 2001
  • 8Lewis,H.R.Excellence without a soul:Howa great university forgot education. . 2006
  • 9Report of the Task Force on General Education. . 2007

二级参考文献8

  • 1甘阳.大学通识教育的纲与目[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2007,18(2):1-6. 被引量:64
  • 2[3]Richard Hersh and John Merrow,eds.,Declining by Degrees:Higher Education at Risk.New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2005.
  • 3[4]James Fallows,"College admissions:a substitute for quality?",Declining by Degrees:Higher Education at Risk,ch.3.
  • 4[1]Jay Mathews,"Caveat lector:unexamined assumptions about quality in higher education",Declining by Degrees:Higher Education at Risk,ch.4.
  • 5[2]Murray Sperber,"How undergraduate education became college lite",Declining by Degrees:Higher Education at Risk,ch.9.
  • 6[3]Howard Gardner,"Beyond markets and individuals:a focus on educational goals";and David L.Kirp,"This littie student went to market",Declining by Degrees:Higher Education at Risk,ch.7 and 8.
  • 7[4]Harry R.Lewis,Excellence Without a Soul:How a Great University Forgot Education,New York:Public Affairs,2006.
  • 8牛畅.2007年哈佛大学通识教育课程改革新举措[J].世界教育信息,2007,20(10):39-41. 被引量:22

共引文献83

同被引文献29

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部