期刊文献+

Demonising the dingo: How much wild dogma is enough? 被引量:2

Demonising the dingo: How much wild dogma is enough?
原文传递
导出
摘要 The roles that top predators play in regulating the structure and function of ecosystems have long been controversial. This is particularly the case when predators pose adverse risks for human life and/or economic interests. The critique of literature on dingoes and their ecological roles in Australia provided by Allen et al. (2011) shows that top predators remain a potentially polarising issue. In opposition to Allen et al. we argue that these widespread patterns of species' abundances, attributed to the ef- fects of dingoes and evident at scales ranging from the foraging behaviour of individuals through to continental scale patterns of species abundances, constitute strong support for the mesopredator release hypothesis and provide evidence that dingoes benefit biodiversity conservation by inducing community wide trophic cascades. Harnessing the positive ecological effects of dingoes while at the same time minimising their impacts on agriculture is a major socio-political challenge in Australia [Current Zoology 57 (5): 668-670].
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期668-670,共3页 动物学报(英文版)
关键词 Trophic cascade Mesopredator release hypothesis DINGO FOX Intra-guild predation 生物多样性保护 野生 物种丰度 经济利益 澳大利亚 生态系统 生态作用
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献94

  • 1Engeman R, Evangelista P, 2006. Investigating the feasibility of a tracking index for monitoring wildlife in the Lower OmoValley, Ethiopia. African Journal of Ecology 45:184-188.
  • 2Engeman RM, Pipas MJ, Gruver KS, BourassAJ, Allen L, 2002. Plot placement when using a passive tracking index to simultaneously monitor multiple species of animals. Wildlife Research 29: 85-90.
  • 3Engeman RM, Allen L, 1999. A passive tracking index for monitoring wild canids and associated species. In: Proceedings of the Second European Vertebrate Pest ManagementConference. Germany: Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry and Technical University of Braunschweig.
  • 4Engeman RM, Allen LR, Zerbe GO, 1998. Variance estimate for the activity index of Allen et al. Wildlife Research 25: 643-648.
  • 5Engeman RM, Pipas M J, Gruver KS, Allen LR, 2000. Monitoring coyote population changes with a passive activity index. Wildlife Research 27: 553-557.
  • 6Evangelista P, Engeman R, Tallents L, 2009. Testing a passive tracking index for monitoring the endangered Ethiopian wolf. Integrative Zoology 4: 172-178.
  • 7Fenner S, Kortner G, Vetoes K, 2009. Aerial baiting with 1080 to control wild dogs does not affect the populations of twocommon small mammal species. Wildlife Research 36: 528-532.
  • 8Fillios M, Gordon C, Koch F, Letnic M, 2010. The effect of a top predator on kangaroo abundance in arid Australia and itsimplications for archaeological faunal assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 986-993.
  • 9Fleming P, Corbett L, Harden R, Thomson P, 2001. Managing the impacts of dingoes and other wild dogs. Canberra: Bureau of Rural Sciences.
  • 10Fleming PJS, Thompson JA, Nicol HI, 1996. Indices for measuring the efficacy of aerial baiting for wild dog control in north-eastern New South Wales. Wildlife Research 23: 665-674.

共引文献2

同被引文献1

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部