期刊文献+

Utility of squamous cell carcinoma antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, Cyfra 21-1 and neuron specific enolase in lung cancer diagnosis: a prospective study from China 被引量:38

Utility of squamous cell carcinoma antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, Cyfra 21-1 and neuron specific enolase in lung cancer diagnosis: a prospective study from China
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Early detection and diagnosis is urgent for the sake of effective treatment strategy for lung cancer. However, a convenient, economical and relatively precise method is not available. We here report a prospective study to find the possible value of the combined use of four popular tumor markers in the early diagnosis of lung cancer among patients with suspicious nodules in the lung. Methods Six hundred and sixty inpatients with suspicious nodules in the lung were divided into a lung cancer group and a benign pulmonary tumor group according to post-operative histological examinations. Serum levels of four tumor markers including squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Cyfra 21-1 and neuron specific enolase (NSE) were assayed for each patient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for each tumor marker. The power of lung cancer diagnosis of each tumor marker, as well as a combination of them were analyzed and compared. Results The serum levels (median, range) of SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE were 0.44 (0.01-35.70) ng/ml, 2.49 (0.30-26.78) ng/ml, 2.30 (0.82-73.33) ng/ml and 10.54 (0.10-56.41) ng/ml respectively in lung cancer group, and were 0.32 (0.01-0.90) ng/ml, 1.60 (0.20-8.93) ng/ml, 1.41 (0.72-4.82) ng/ml and 9.36 (6.56-24.24) ng/ml respectively in the benign pulmonary tumor group. The difference in each tumor marker between the two groups was significant (P 〈0.05). The ROCs of SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE were 0.702 (95% CI, 0.654-0.751), 0.611 (95% CI, 0.563-0.659), 0.650 (95% Cl, 0.601-0.700) and 0.598 (95% Cl, 0.542-0.654) respectively, indicating very low power of these four tumor markers. When a combination of SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE were empfoyed, the diagnosis power was strengthened. Conclusion SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE are valuable in the early diagnosis of lung cancer among suspicious nodules in the lung, especially when they were assayed together for one patient. Background Early detection and diagnosis is urgent for the sake of effective treatment strategy for lung cancer. However, a convenient, economical and relatively precise method is not available. We here report a prospective study to find the possible value of the combined use of four popular tumor markers in the early diagnosis of lung cancer among patients with suspicious nodules in the lung. Methods Six hundred and sixty inpatients with suspicious nodules in the lung were divided into a lung cancer group and a benign pulmonary tumor group according to post-operative histological examinations. Serum levels of four tumor markers including squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Cyfra 21-1 and neuron specific enolase (NSE) were assayed for each patient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for each tumor marker. The power of lung cancer diagnosis of each tumor marker, as well as a combination of them were analyzed and compared. Results The serum levels (median, range) of SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE were 0.44 (0.01-35.70) ng/ml, 2.49 (0.30-26.78) ng/ml, 2.30 (0.82-73.33) ng/ml and 10.54 (0.10-56.41) ng/ml respectively in lung cancer group, and were 0.32 (0.01-0.90) ng/ml, 1.60 (0.20-8.93) ng/ml, 1.41 (0.72-4.82) ng/ml and 9.36 (6.56-24.24) ng/ml respectively in the benign pulmonary tumor group. The difference in each tumor marker between the two groups was significant (P 〈0.05). The ROCs of SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE were 0.702 (95% CI, 0.654-0.751), 0.611 (95% CI, 0.563-0.659), 0.650 (95% Cl, 0.601-0.700) and 0.598 (95% Cl, 0.542-0.654) respectively, indicating very low power of these four tumor markers. When a combination of SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE were empfoyed, the diagnosis power was strengthened. Conclusion SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE are valuable in the early diagnosis of lung cancer among suspicious nodules in the lung, especially when they were assayed together for one patient.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第20期3244-3248,共5页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 lung neoplasm tumor marker DIAGNOSIS lung neoplasm tumor marker diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Henschke CI,Yankelevitz DF.CT screening for lung cancer:update 2007.Oncologist 2008; 13:65-78.
  • 2Raj Behl P,Hilton CJ,Holden MP.Mediastinoscope:another use.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1986; 27:236-237.
  • 3Lagarde A,Forgach T,Nagy D,Nagy K,Vasas S,Janoki GA.Diagnostic sensitivity of three tumour markers in non-small cell lung cancer:a pilot study.Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur 2000; 3:139-142.
  • 4Beasley MB,Brambilla E,Travis WD.The 2004 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors.Semin Roentgenol 2005; 40:90-97.
  • 5Jemal A,Siegel R,Ward E,Hao Y,Xu J,Murray T,et al.Cancer statistics,2008.CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58:71-96.
  • 6Krotz D.Low-dose CT screening reduces lung cancer deaths.Diagn Imaging (San Franc) 2000; Suppl:7-9.
  • 7Muraki M,Tohda Y,Iwanaga T,Uejima H,Nagasaka Y,Nakajima S.Assessment of serum CYFRA 21-1 in lung cancer.Cancer 1996; 77:1274-1277.
  • 8Kulpa J,Wojcik E,Reinfuss M,Kolodziejski L.Carcinoembryonic antigen,squamous cell carcinoma antigen,CYFRA 21-1,and neuron-specific enolase in squamous cell lung cancer patients.Clin Chem 2002; 48:1931-1937.
  • 9Parkin DM,Bray F,Ferlay J,Pisani P.Global cancer statistics,2002.CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55:74-108..
  • 10Ando S,Kimura H,Iwai N,Shima M,Ando M,Kuriyarna T.Optimal combination of seven tumour markers in prediction of advanced stage at first examination of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Anticancer Res 2001; 21:3085-3092.

二级参考文献20

  • 1刘志东,许绍发,秦明,赵立强,李福根,段勇,粱子昆.隆凸切除成形与重建术治疗中晚期肺癌[J].中国肺癌杂志,2004,7(5):434-437. 被引量:3
  • 2郭华北,蒋秉坤.CYFRA21-1:新的非小细胞肺癌标志物[J].国外医学(临床生物化学与检验学分册),1995,16(1):8-11. 被引量:13
  • 3余剑英,黄柏英.联合检测血清CEA、CA125、NSE对肺癌的诊断价值[J].实用预防医学,2005,12(3):583-584. 被引量:6
  • 4Bungay HK,Pal CR,Davies CWH,et al.An evaluation of computed tomorgraphy as an aid to diagnosis in patients undergoing bronchoscopy for suspected bronchial carcinoma.Clin Radiol,2000;55(5):554-560.
  • 5Macdonal S.Carcinoembryonic antigen screening:pros and cons.Semin Oncol,1999;26(5):556-562.
  • 6Salgia R,Harpole D,Hemdon JE,et al.Role of serum tumor markers CA125 and CEA in non-small cell lung cancer.Anticancer Res,2001;21(2B):124-131.
  • 7Lai RS,Chen CC,Lee PC,et al.Evaluation of cytokeratin19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) as a tumor marker in malignant pleural effusion.Jpn J Clin Oncol,1999;29(9):421-427.
  • 8Alatas F,Alatas O,Metintas M,et al.Diagnostic value of CEA,CA153,CA19-9,CYFRA21-1,NSE and TSA assay in pleural effutions.Lung Cancer,2001;31(1):9-16.
  • 9LeiWD,ZhangRG,YanSZetal.NDPK/NM23 expressionanditscorrelationwithlymphnodemetastasisin humanlungcancer[].ChinJOncol.1994
  • 10JiangY,HeA,XiaS.Immunohistochemicalanalysisof nm23geneproduct/nucleoside diphosphatekinaseexpression inhumanlungcarcinoma[].ChinJTubercRespirDis.1995

共引文献376

同被引文献206

引证文献38

二级引证文献300

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部