2Tinbergen J. 1963. Shaping the Wodd Economic Policy: Suggestion for an International Economic Policy [J]. The Amer?ican Economic Review ,53 (3) :514-516.
3Poyhonen P. A. 1963. Tentative Model for the Flows of Trade between Countries [J]. Welwirtschaftliches Archiu , 90 ( 1 ) : 93-99.
4Bergstrand 1. H. 1989. The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71 (1) : 143-153.
5Feenstra R. C. ,Markusen 1. R. and Rose A. K. 2001. Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate among Alternative Theories of Trade[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics, (34) :430-447.
6Evenett S. and Keller W. 2002. On Theories Explaining the Success of Gravity Equation [J]. Journal of Political Econ?omy,110(2):281-316.
7Anderson 1. E. and Wincoop E. 2003. Gravity with Cravitas , A Solution to the Border Puzzle [J]. American Economic Review ,93 (1) : 170-192.
8Haveman 1. and Hummels D. 2004. Alternative Hypotheses and Volume of Trade: The Gravity Equation and the Extent of Specialization[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics, (37) : 199-218.
9Tamirisa N. T. 1999. Exchange and Capital Control as Barriers to Trade[J]. International Monetary Fund ,46 ( 1) :69- 88.
10Okubo T. 2004. The Border Effect in the Japanese Market: A Gravity Model Analysisj. Journal Japanese Internation?al Economies, 18 (1 ) : 1-11.
