商鞅与梭伦耕战思想的比较分析

Comparative Study on the views of the cultivation and war between Shangyang and Solon

商鞅和梭伦的上台皆因受困于"耕"和"战"。两者都重视耕战,但在制度安排上则有所不同,商鞅打破现状,重在变革;梭伦承认现实,重在继承。商鞅是通过类似于军事的手段重构了政治秩序,而梭伦则以平衡城邦内部不同阶层利益的方式缓和了公民的内部矛盾。在影响上,商鞅使得秦人因耕战而成为国家严密控制的对象,沦为国家的奴隶;梭伦则使得雅典公民成功地参予了政治,成为城邦的主人。

Shangyang and Solon coming into power both as the ＂ cultivation＂ and ＂war＂. They pay attention to cultivation and war, but different in the design of system. Shangyang breaks the present situation, while Solon mainly acknowledges it. We hold that their basic differences in that the former reconstraction the system by military means while the latter alleviates the contradiction by balanced the benefits of the different social classes. Shangyang make the man of the Qinguo into the slaves of the country, while the people of Athens success in participating in the politics and turn into the master of the country under the reform of Solon.