期刊文献+

影响生态足迹模型计算结果的因素分析——以云南省为例 被引量:1

Factors Affect the Ecological Footprint Calculating Results:Taking Yunnan Province as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析对生态足迹模型计算结果会产生影响的各类因素对计算结果的稳定与可靠有重要意义。文章将各类影响因素分为两个大类四个小类,并测算了这些因素对最终计算结果的影响程度。以云南省2009年的生态足迹为例,结果表明:统计数据中土地面积数值的突然变化,均衡因子、产量因子的选择对计算结果影响最大,分别达到19.3%和16.46%;计算中缺失项目对计算结果的影响约为3.2%;除水产品产量数值外,其它计算参数变化对计算结果造成的影响不大。因此,建立生态足迹研究合作机构,从而统一数据收集整理过程、规范计算参数、计算方法,这是确保生态足迹计算结果有效的最佳措施。 To explore the factors that affect the ecological practical significance. In this paper, after comparing with the footprint calculating results has theoretical and different effect by using different settings, we found that the sudden changing of raw data item values, especially the land area, equivalence factors, yield fac- tors used in the calculation and the lack of some items which were included in the ecological footprint model would result in an error about 19.3%, 16.46% and 3.2% respectively in 2009. So the best way to get a high quality result is to establish a cooperative institution for the purpose of common raw data, real parameters and the same methods used in the calculating of ecological footprint.
作者 田存志 彭浩
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第5期55-62,共8页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"我国主权财富基金对外战略投资研究"(11XJY023)
关键词 生态足迹 可持续发展 影响因素 ecological footprint sustainable development factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献97

共引文献1028

同被引文献33

  • 1华红莲,张碧星,庄立会.云南省2003年的生态足迹分析[J].云南地理环境研究,2007,19(1):20-23. 被引量:7
  • 2谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,曹淑艳,肖玉.生态系统服务的供给、消费和价值化[J].资源科学,2008,30(1):93-99. 被引量:165
  • 3Zhang W G, Hu Y M, Zhang J, et al. Assessment of land usechange and potential eco-service value in the upper reaches ofMinjiang River, ChinafJ]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2007,18(2): 97-102.
  • 4Zhang Z, Zhao W, Gu X. Changes resulting from a landconsolidation project (LCP) and its resource-environmenteffects: A case study in Tianmen City of Hubei Province,China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 40: 74-82.
  • 5Shi Y,Zhou C B, Wang R S, et al. Measuring China’s regionalecological development through “EcoDP,[J]. EcologicalIndicators, 2011, 15(1): 253-262.
  • 6Kissinger M, Approaches for calculating a nation’s foodecological footprint - The case of Canada[J]. EcologicalIndicators, 2013,24: 366-374.
  • 7Li X B, Tian M R, Wang H, et al. Development of anecological security evaluation method based on the ecologicalfootprint and application to a typical steppe region in China[J].Ecological Indicators, 2014,39: 153-159.
  • 8Teng J Y, Wu X G. Eco-footprint-based life-cycle eco-efficiency assessment of building projects[J]. EcologicalIndicators, 2014, 39: 160-168.
  • 9Lawrence T J, Robinson G P. Reckoning perverse outcomes ofresource conservation policies using the EcologicalFootprint[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014,41: 87-95.
  • 10Liu M C, Zhang D, Min Q W, et al. The calculation ofproductivity factor for ecological footprints in China: Amethodological note[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 38:124-129.

引证文献1

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部