期刊文献+

地铁行车调度系统人误影响因素识别及评定研究 被引量:19

Identification and Evaluation of Human Error Influential Factors in Subway Scheduling System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为寻找影响地铁行车调度系统人误的因素,提出结合SHEL模型与层次分析法(AHP)的人-机-环系统人误影响因素识别及评定技术。通过扩展SHEL模型到人-任务、人-列车、人-人机界面、人-环境、人-线路、人-人、人-客观其他7个界面,构建人误影响因素分析模型;在对上海地铁54名行车调度员问卷调查的基础上,引以因子分析法识别出19项人误影响因素;并通过搭建人误影响因素层次结构模型及运用AHP法实现对人误影响因素的评定。结果表明,影响行车调度人误的因素中权重居前5位的分别为客流问题、行车密度、问题列车数、人机界面可支持性及人机界面布局合理性。因此,在客观运营条件不能改变的情况下,可以用改善人机界面条件来减少人误的发生。 ABased on the SHEL model and AHP method, an identification and evaluation method for human error influential factors in human-machine-environment system is proposed to research the human error factors in subway scheduling system. Then a model for human error factor analysis is constructed by expanding SHEL model into seven interfaces, which are liveware-task interface, liveware-train interface, liveware-HMl (human-machine-interface) interface, liveware-environment interface, liveware-route interface, liveware-human interface and liveware-others interface. Based on a questionnaire investigation of 54 experienced OCC controllers from Shanghai, 19 factors were extracted by the factor analysis method and were weighted by the AHP method. The results show that passenger factors, train traveling density, the number of adjustment trains, supportability of HMI and layout rationally of HMI are the top 5 key factors influencing the probability of human errors. Improving HMI condition may reduce the human error probability when objective operation condition of subway cannot be changed.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第8期74-79,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家重点实验室自主基金资助(RCS2008ZT003)
关键词 人误影响因素 SHEL模型 层次分析法(AHP) 因子分析 地铁行车调度员 human error influential factors SHEL model analytic hierarchy process (AHP) factor analysis OCC (subway operation control center) controller
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Ronald W M, Guy HW, Neville M. Analysing and modeling train driver performance[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2005, 36(6) :671 -680.
  • 2Melissa T B, Andrew S M, John R W. Understanding the human factors contribution to railway accidents and incidents in Australia[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2008, 40(5): 1750- 1757.
  • 3ATKINS&IOE. Rail-Specific Human Reliability Assessment Technique for Driving Tasks (Final Report)[R]. London : RSSB, 2005.
  • 4张殿业,戴明森,金健,曹琦.机车乘务员安全可靠性评价模式[J].铁道学报,1999,21(1):99-101. 被引量:16
  • 5魏新平,雷珍国.铁路行车调度系统人员可靠性分析[J].铁道运营技术,2009,15(4):51-53. 被引量:8
  • 6戢晓峰,刘澜.铁路系统安全的人因研究综述[J].人类工效学,2007,13(4):51-54. 被引量:16
  • 7陈喜春.基于人因紧张度的铁路编组站可靠性研究[J].铁道运输与经济,2010,32(5):86-90. 被引量:1
  • 8Swain AD, Guttmann HE. Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications (NUREG/CR-1278)[R]. Washington: U.S. NRC, 1983.
  • 9D Gertman, H Blackman, J Marble, et al. The SPAR-H Human Reliability Analysis Method (NUREG/CR-6883)[R]. Washington : U.S. NRC, 2005.
  • 10Hannaman G W, Spurgin A J, Luckic Y. Human Cognitive Reliability Model for PSA Analysis(Draft Report NUS-4531)[R]. San Diego: Electric Power and Research Institute, 1985.

二级参考文献37

共引文献124

同被引文献118

引证文献19

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部