期刊文献+

空管威胁、差错与意外状态的贝叶斯模型分析研究 被引量:13

Study on Threat,Error and Undesired States in Air Traffic Control Based on Bayesian Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为准确理解民航空中交通管理中各类人为差错数据的可靠性和相关性,为安全决策提供量化依据,对空管威胁、差错和意外状态数据进行贝叶斯模型分析。该方法在先验概率基础上,通过研究空中意外状态发生条件下威胁与差错各自发生的后验概率,获得上述3类安全信息的相关性大小排序。针对收集到的625起数据样本进行了研究,结果表明:与空中意外状态的发生相关性最大的3类差错依次为:管制员对机组的通讯差错、信息差错以及管制员对管制员的通讯差错;与空中意外状态的发生相关性最大的3类威胁依次为:程序威胁、相邻单位威胁和空中交通威胁。空管运行单位的安全管控应重点关注管制员/机组间的通讯差错,并针对各种可能出现的威胁预先制定应对程序。 To accurately understand the reliability and correlations of all kinds of human error data in civil air traffic control and thus provide quantitative basis for decision-making, an analysis of the data about the threat, error and unexpected state in air traffic control was conducted by using Bayesian model. This analysis, based on the prior probability, obtained the sequence of the correlations of the three kinds of safety information above through studying the respective posterior probabilities of threats and errors under unexpected states. Investigation on 625 sample data shows that the three kinds of errors most correlated to unexpected state are communication error of ATCs ( air traffic controllers) to pilots, information error, and communication error of ATCs to ATCs in order; and that the three kinds of threats most correlated to unexpected state are procedure threat, threat from adjacent units, and air traffic threat in order. Therefore, the safety control of ATC units should lay their emphasis on the communication errors between ATC controller and pilots and on making corresponding procedures against all kinds of oossible threats.
作者 曹海峰 李彤
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第8期85-89,共5页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(60979006)
关键词 空中交通管制(ATC) 人为差错 威胁与差错管理(TEM) 贝叶斯估计 相关性 air traffic control(ATC) human error threat and error management(TEM) Bayesian evaluation correlation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1European Air Traffic Management Programme. The Human Error in ATM Technique, HERA-JANUS[R]. Geneva: Euro- pean Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation, 2003.
  • 2International Civil Aviation Organization. Threat and Error Management in Air Traffic Control, C314-AN/178[R]. Mont- real: International Civil Aviation Organization, 2008.
  • 3International Civil Aviation Organization. Line Operations Safety Audit, D9803-AN/761 [R]. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization, 2002.
  • 4Ashleigh Merritt, James Klinect. Defensive Flying for Pilots: An Introduction to Threat and Error Management L R J. Austin: The University of Texas Human Factors Research Project, The LOSA Collaborative, 2006.
  • 5Dodd B. Safety data integration can lead to better understanding of risk[J].International Civil Aviation Organization Jour- nal, 2007, 62(2):21 -22.
  • 6Anthony M P, Douglas A W, Scott S. Air traffic control related accidents and incidents: a human factors analysis[A]. The 11^th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology[C]. Columbus, OH,2001:1 -4.
  • 7James T. Luxh~j, David W. Modeling low probability/high consequence events: An aviation safety risk model[A]. Reli- ability and Maintainability Symposium, RAMS 06 Annual Conference[C] . Newport Beach, CA,2006:215 -221.
  • 8James T. LuxhФj. Risk Analysis of Human performance in aviation maintenance[.A]. 16^th Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Symposium[ C]. San Francisco, CA,2002 : 1 - 9.
  • 9Milan Janic. An assessment of risk and safety in civil aviation[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2000, 6(1) : 43 - 50.
  • 10吕人力,曹海峰,周艳,白福利.民航3类安全信息的TEM分布特征比较研究[J].安全与环境学报,2010,10(3):170-174. 被引量:4

二级参考文献14

  • 1罗晓利.近12年中国民航人因事故与事故征候的分类研究(英文)[J].航天医学与医学工程,2004,17(5):318-321. 被引量:5
  • 2International Civil Aviation Organization.Safety management manual,DOC 9859-AN/460[M].Montreal:International Civil Aviation Organization,2006.
  • 3International Civil Aviation Organization.Line operations safety audit,DOC 9803-AN/761[M].Montreal:International Civil Aviation Organization,2002.
  • 4International Civil Aviation Organization.Normal operations safety survey,DOC 9910-AN/473[M].Montreal:International Civil Aviation Organization,2008.
  • 5Intentional Civil Aviation Organization.Safety oversight audit manual,DOC 9735-AN/960[M].2nd ed.Montreal:International Civil Aviation Organization,2006.
  • 6SEAMSTER,THOMAS L,KANKI,et al.Aviation information management:from document to data[M].Aldershot:Ashgate,2002.
  • 7WIEGMANN D,SHAPPELL S.Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents:application of the human factors analysis and classification system[J].Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine,2001,72(11):1006-1016.
  • 8DODD B.Safety data integration can lead to better understanding of risk[J].Intentional Civil Aviation Organization Journal,2007(2):21-22.
  • 9Intentional Civil Aviation Organization.Annex 13 to the convention on international civil aviation:aircraft accident and incident investigation[M].9th ed.Montreal:International Civil Aviation Organization,2001.
  • 10Civil Aviation Administration of China(中国民航局).Regulation on Civil Aviation Safety Information Management(民航航空安全信息管理规定)[M].Beijing:Civil Aviation Administration of China,2007.

共引文献3

同被引文献72

  • 1吴文海,吕雪涛,曲志刚,程瑞.航空安全中人的因素研究现状[J].飞机设计,2012,32(4):63-68. 被引量:7
  • 2杨昌其,魏光兴.空管不安全事件危险等级的量化评估方法[J].西南交通大学学报,2006,41(6):753-757. 被引量:10
  • 3丁松滨,石荣,施和平.证据理论在空中交通管理安全评价中的应用[J].中国民航学院学报,2006,24(6):38-41. 被引量:14
  • 4姚国庆.博弈论[M].天津:南开大学出版社,2002..
  • 5International Civil Aviation Organization. Line operations safety audit, DOC 9803-AN/761 . Montreal: ICAO, 2002.
  • 6International Civil Aviation Organization. Threat and error management in air traffic control, circular 314-AN/178[M]. Montreal: ICAO, 2008.
  • 7MCFADDEN K L, TOWELL E R. Aviation human factors: a framework for the new millennium[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 1999, 5(4): 177 184.
  • 8DODD B. Safety data integration can lead to better understanding of risk[J]. International Civil Aviation Organization Journal, 2007, 62(2): 21 22.
  • 9ANTHONY M P, DOUGLAS A W, SCOTT S. Air traffic control related accidents and incidents: a human factors analysis //Proc of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus: The Ohio State University, 2001: 1 4.
  • 10LUXHΦJ J T, COIT D W. Modeling low probability/high consequence events: an aviation safety risk model //Proc of Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 2006 Annual. New Jersey: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2006: 215-221.

引证文献13

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部