期刊文献+

人格测量:从累积式模型到展开式模型 被引量:2

Personality Assessment:From Dominance Model to Unfolding Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前大多数人格测量都采用的是累积式反应模型方法,该模型假设被试在测验上的得分随其能力或特质提高而增加,但是随着人格测量技术的不断发展,这一模型的实施效果遭到了质疑,研究者们开始关注展开式模型,该模型认为被试的反应取决于被试能力和项目阈值的匹配程度,当被试能力与项目阈值完全匹配时,被试做出肯定回答的概率达到最高点,称之为"理想点",展开式模型的目的就是找到被试的理想点,从而寻找其真正的态度强度或人格特质水平。GGUM作为一种比较成熟的展开式模型,已经开始应用于人格测量的各个领域,但仍需要进行大规模的试测,在评估和预测效度方面积累经验,建立业界认可的心理测量学标准,不断探讨和开发相应的心理测量理论和简便易行的统计程序。 The majority of personality scales in use today were developed using dominance model, which assume that respondents with higher trait levels exhibit higher item scores than do those with low trait levels and that the probability of observing a high item score increases monotonically as the distance between person and item locations increases, shows that the probability of a positive response increases as a person lies increasingly distant and above the item' s location. But as personality assessment technology developed, the reliance on dominance assumptions and associated scale construction procedures has been queried. Researchers begin to pay attention to the unfolding model,which assume people respond positively to items that have locations similar to their own. In probabilistic terms, as the distance between a respondent' s location on the trait continuum( called his or her ideal point)and the item' s location increases, the probability of endorsing the item decreases. As a more mature model, GGUM has been used in many personality assessment fields, but still need to undertake large - scale test to accumulate experience of evaluation and forecast validity, establish an acknowledged psychometric norm, and continue to explore corresponding theory and simple statistical procedure.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2011年第5期455-458,共4页 Psychological Exploration
基金 首都师范大学北京市"发展与教育心理学"重点学科 北京市"学习与认知"重点实验室 国家社会科学基金"十一五"规划课题(BBA090065)
关键词 人格测量 展开式模型 理想点 累积式模型 personality assessment unfolding model ideal - point dominance model
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Goldberg L R. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 1993,48 : 26 - 34.
  • 2Ones D S, Viswesvaran C, Reiss A D. Role of social desira- bility in personality testing for personnel selection:The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996,81:660 - 679.
  • 3Stark S, Chernyshenko 0 S, Chan K Y, et al.. Effects of the testing situation on item responding:Cause for concern. Jour- nal of Applied Psychology ,2001,86:943 - 953.
  • 4Goldberg L R. International personality item pool:A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality and other individual differences. Retrieved May 20,2001, from http ://ipip. ori. org/ipip, 1998.
  • 5Chernyshenko O S, Stark S, Drasgow F, et al.. Constructingpersonality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point re- sponse process: Toward increasing the flexibility of personali- ty measures. Psychological Assessment, 2007,19 ( 1 ) : 88 - 106.
  • 6Stark S, Chernyshenko O S, Drasgow F, et al.. Examining as- sumptions about item responding in personality assessment:should ideal point methods be considered for scale develop- ment and scoring? Journal of Applied Psychological,2006,91 ( 1 ) :25 -39.
  • 7Chernyshenko O S,Stark S,Chan K Y,et al.. Fitting item re- sponse theory models to two personality inventories:Issues and insights. Multivariate Behavioral Research,2001,36:523 - 562.
  • 8Andrich D, Luo G. A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding dichotomous single - stimulus responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1993,17 (3) :253 - 276.
  • 9Reise S P,Waller N G. Fitting the two - parameter model to personality data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1990, 14:45 - 58.
  • 10Roberts J S. Item response theory approaches to attitude measurement. Doctoral dissertation. University of South Carolina, Columbia, 1995.

二级参考文献14

  • 1郭庆科,周晶.Likert量表分析中不同IRT模型的有效性[J].心理学探新,2004,24(3):67-70. 被引量:36
  • 2Luo G.A.joint maximum likelihood estimation procedure for the hyperbolic cosine model for single-stimulus responses.Applied Psychological Measurement,2000,24:33-49.
  • 3Roberts J S,Donoghue J R,Laughlin J E.A general item response theory model for unfolding unidimensional polytomous responses.Applied Psychological Measurement,2000,24(1):3-32.
  • 4Roberts J S.GGUM2000:Estimation of parameters in the generalized graded unfolding model.Applied Psychological Measurement,2001:25,38.
  • 5Roberts J S,Donoghue J R,Laughlin J E.Characteristics of MML/EAP parameter estimates in the generalized graded unfolding model.Applied Psychological Measurement,2002,26:192-207.
  • 6DeMars C E.Type I error rates for the generalized graded unfolding model fit indices.Applied Psychological Measurement,2004,28:48-71.
  • 7Drasgow F,Levine M V,Tsien S,Williams B A,Mead A D.Fitting polytomous IRT models to multiple-choice tests.Applied Psychological Measurement,1995,19:143-165.
  • 8Chernyshenko O S,Stark S,Chan K Y,Drasgow K,Williams B.Fitting Item Response Theory Models to Two Personality Inventories:Issues and Insights.Multivariate Behavioral Research,2001,36 (4):523-562.
  • 9Mislevy R,Bock R D.PC BILOG 3:Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models (2nd.ed.).Chicago IL:Scientific Software,Inc,1990.
  • 10Thissen D.MULTILOG user's guide (Version 6.0).Mooresville,IN:Scientific Software,1991.

共引文献9

同被引文献23

  • 1刘铁川,魏义梅,王鹏.大学生人格健康问卷的信息量分析[J].山东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2009,25(5):99-102. 被引量:5
  • 2郭庆科,周晶.Likert量表分析中不同IRT模型的有效性[J].心理学探新,2004,24(3):67-70. 被引量:36
  • 3郭庆科,苗金凤,王昭.IRT展开模型及对非累积反应机制的检测[J].心理学探新,2006,26(1):66-69. 被引量:10
  • 4王征宇.症状自评量表[J].上海精神医学,1984,2:69-69.
  • 5孔明,卞冉,张厚粲.平行分析在探索性因素分析中的应用[J].心理科学,2007,30(4):924-925. 被引量:38
  • 6DEROGATIS L R. SCL - 90: Administration, Scoring, and Procedure Manual - I for the R(revised) Version[ S]. Baltimore : John Hopkins University, School of Medicine, 1977.
  • 7FERNANDO P J. The impact of social desirability bias on the EPQ-R item scores:An item response theory analysis [ J ]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2008, 44 ( 8 ) : 1784-1794.
  • 8STARK S, CHERNYSHENKO 0 S, DRASGOW F, et al. Examining assumptions about item responding in personal- ity assessment:Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? [ J ]. Journal of Ap- plied Psychology ,2006,91 ( 1 ) :55-59.
  • 9BAKER F B. The basics of item response theory [ M ]. Portsmouth : Heinemann, 1985.
  • 10HOLLAND P W, H W. Differential item functioning [ M]. Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum, 1994.

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部