期刊文献+

新西兰保险增值税的一个理论解释:保险本位商品说 被引量:9

An Theoretical Explanation of New Zealand′s Insurance VAT: Insurance Product Ontologism
原文传递
导出
摘要 新西兰"反计还原"的保险增值税模式因设计精巧、运转良好而倍受推崇,但因缺乏坚实的理论基础而使其辐射功能与借鉴意义大打折扣。保险本位商品说将保险本身定义为一种纯粹独立的商品并明晰其生产成本,否定了"保险商品的生产过程和消费过程为同一过程"的错误论断,为保险商品构建了完整的流转过程,从而为新西兰"反计还原"的模式提供了理论基础,将有助于我国对新西兰经验的学习和借鉴,以优化保险增值税税制设计。 New Zealand's insurance VAT system, characterized by Re, verse restoration approach, is deliberately designed, functions well and is learnt by other countries worldwide. Without sound and safe theoretical basis, New Zealand's insurance VAT Model has less proliferation capacity. After the success of VAT transformation in 2009, China mainland is rolling her VAT expansion reform to cover finance and insurance sectors. Chinese scholars from both tax and insurance are digging into New Zealand's insurance VAT Model in an attempt to get a approximate analysis of its success. In this process, insurance product ontologism rose in the 1990s which defines insurance itself as a kind of independent product and constructs a commodity transfer process for insurance prod- uct to make insurance VAT theoretically robust and practically feasible is very helpful. The combination of New Zealand's insurance VAT Model and insurance ontologism will illuminate China mainland's insurance VAT design.
作者 吴祥佑
出处 《税务与经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期84-89,共6页 Taxation and Economy
基金 福建省教育厅2011年人文社科项目"海西多层次可持续农业保险发展模式研究"(项目编号:JA11205S) 闽江学院2011年社科启动项目"海峡西岸医疗健康保障体系比较研究"(项目编号:YSQ1102)的阶段性成果之一
关键词 保险增值税 反计还原法 保险本位商品说 自然 insurance value added reverse restoration insurance ontologism nature
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献32

共引文献145

同被引文献60

  • 1谭立.关于小规模纳税人价税流的研究与思考[J].税务研究,1997(3):50-53. 被引量:1
  • 2娄权.上市公司税负及其影响因素分析——来自沪深股市的经验证据[J].财会通讯(学术版),2007(3):6-8. 被引量:9
  • 3尚红云.产业关联测度系数及计算方法的改进[J].统计教育,2007(8):9-11. 被引量:5
  • 4张秋莉.营业税改增值税对试点行业税负影响的分析[J].现代经济信息,2012(23):185,197.
  • 5Donald J. Rousslang, Should Financial Services Be Taxed under a Consumption Tax? National Tax Journal, Vol. 55, No. 2,2002.
  • 6Ernst and Young, Value-Added Taxes.. A Study of Methods of Taxing Financial and Insurance Services. Brussels: European Commission, 1998.
  • 7Glenn P. Jenkins and Rup Khadka, Value-added Policy and Implementation in Singapore, IBFD, VAT Monitor, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1998.
  • 8Harry Grubert and James Mackie, Must Financial Services Be Taxed under a Consumption Tax? National Tax Journal, Vol. 53, No. 1,2000.
  • 9International Monetary Fund, Taxing the Financial Sector: Concept, Issue and Practices. December 2003.
  • 10OECD,Indirect Tax Treatment of Financial Services and Instruments. Report of the OECD, 22O0. , 1998.

引证文献9

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部