期刊文献+

中国出口企业“生产率悖论”存在性检验——来自2005~2008年中国制造业企业的证据 被引量:12

The Existence Test of the 'Productivity Paradox' of Chinese Exporters:The Evidence from the Data of Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises from 2005 to 2008
原文传递
导出
摘要 在异质性企业贸易理论提出后,对中国企业生产率的计算认为中国存在出口企业的"生产率悖论",即出口企业的生产率比非出口企业的生产率要低。但是测算只是运用了求企业生产率的平均值的方法,这不能反映出口企业与非出口企业的生产率整体状况。文章使用2005~2008年中国制造业企业数据,运用总量法和均值法分行业、分地区计算并比较出口企业与非出口企业的生产率,从而检验中国出口企业"生产率悖论"的存在性。最后实证检验生产率与企业出口规模的相关性,结论显示生产率与企业出口是负相关的,这也是一种检验"生产率悖论"存在性的方法。 With the trade theory of heterogeneous enterprises, the calculation of the productivity of Chinese enterprises shows that there is a 'productivity paradox' in Chinese exporters, that is, the productivity of exporters is lower than that of non-exporters. However, since the measure only adopts the method of calculating the average result of the productivity of enterprises, it cannot demonstrate the overall productivity of exporters and non-exporters. With the data of Chinese manufacturing enterprises from 2005 to 2008, the paper uses the total method and the average method to calculate by industry and region, and compares the productivity of exporters with that of non-exporters, thereby proving the existence of the 'paradox' of Chinese export enterprises. Finally, the empirical result of the interdependency between the productivity and the export scale of enterprises shows that the productivity is negatively correlated with export, which means that this is also a method to test the existence of the 'paradox'
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第11期39-47,共9页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 辽宁省社科联项目(2010lslktjjx-17) 大连理工大学人才创新基金项目(3012-893322)
关键词 出口 生产率 异质性企业 悖论 export productivity heterogeneous enterprise paradox
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献91

  • 1黄先海,石东楠.对外贸易对我国全要素生产率影响的测度与分析[J].世界经济研究,2005(1):22-26. 被引量:67
  • 2倪海青,王咏梅.出口影响我国全要素生产率提高的实证研究[J].开发研究,2005(6):72-74. 被引量:5
  • 3江小涓.我国出口商品结构的决定因素和变化趋势[J].经济研究,2007,42(5):4-16. 被引量:194
  • 4赵伟,李淑贞.出口与企业生产率:由实证而理论的最新拓展[J].国际贸易问题,2007(7):24-30. 被引量:14
  • 5Aitken, Brian, Gordon Hanson and Ann Harrison, 1997, "Spillovers, Foreign Investment, and Export Behaviour", Journal of International Economics 43 (1--2) : 103--132.
  • 6Aw, Bee Yan, Sukkyun Chung and Mark J. Roberts, 2000, "Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro-level Evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China)," World Bank Economic Review 14 (1) : 65--90.
  • 7Baldwin, Richard E., 2005, "Heterogeneous Firms and Trade: Testable and Uutestable Properties of the Melitz Model", NBER Working Paper No. 11471.
  • 8Bernard, Andrew B., Jonathan Eaton, J. Bradford Jensen and Samuel Kortum, 2003, "Plants and Productivity in International Trade," American Economic Review 93: 1268--1290.
  • 9Bernard, A. and J. Bradford Jensen, 1995, "Exporters, Jobs and Wages in U.S. Manufacturing, 1976--1987", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Mieroeeonomics, 67--119.
  • 10Bernard, Andrew B. and J. Bradford Jensen, 1999a, "Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?" Journal of lnternational Economics 47 : 1--26.

共引文献583

引证文献12

二级引证文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部