期刊文献+

基于科研绩效框架(REF)的三种文献计量模式 被引量:5

Three Models of Bibliometrics based on REF
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科研绩效框架(REF)是英国政府提出的一种评估科研的全新理念。论文概述REF评价的主客体,并从精确性、成本效益、行为动机三方面对三种文献计量模式进行比较分析,然后论述其对未来评估体系的影响,认为REF中的引文分析不仅给年轻科研人员带来不公平的影响,而且不适用于所有学科,对不同学科的评价也有局限性。 REF, proposed by British government, is a new idea used in assessment of scientific research. This paper outlines subject and object in its assessment, compares the three models of bibliometrics in terms of accuracy, cost effectiveness and behavioural incentives, and then demonstrates the influence on the assessment systems in the future. Finally, it comes to a conclusion that citation analysis in REF not only has an unfair impact on young researchers, but also inapplicable to all disciplines and has some limitations on the evaluation of different disciplines.
作者 邓荔萍
出处 《新世纪图书馆》 CSSCI 2011年第11期46-49,共4页 New Century Library
关键词 科研绩效框架(REF) 文献计量 科学评价 Research Excellence Framework ( REF ) Bibliometrics Scientific evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1HEFCE & The four UK higher education founding bod- ies.The Research Excellence Framework:A brief guide to the proposals [EB/OL] .http://www.hefce. ac.uk/research/ref /develop/2010- l 2-28.
  • 2HEFCE.Report on the pilot exercise to develop bib- liometric indicators for the Research Excellence Frame- work[EB/OL] .http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/he fee/2009/09 39/2011-01-01.
  • 3HEFCE & Technopolis.Identification and dissemination of lessons learned by institutions participating in the Re- search Excellence Framework (REF) bibliometrics pilot: Results of the Round Two Consultation[EB/OL].http://ww- w.he fce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2009/rd 18_09/2011-01-03.
  • 4刘煜.为高等教育寻找有意义的绩效分析与评估的方法[EB/OL].htqp://2C2.114.9.59/xuekeguanyuan/train/incities.pdf,2011-q-01·-03.
  • 5HEFCE & Technopolis. Identification and dissemination of lessons learned by institutions participating in the Re- search Excellence Framework(REF)bibliometrics pilot:Re- suits of the Round one consultation [EB/OL].http://www. he fce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2009/rd09_09/2011-01-05.
  • 6李超.科学评价体系中的引文分析方法[J].辽宁大学学报(自然科学版),2007,34(1):85-87. 被引量:6
  • 7王洪斌,鲁婉玉.我国高校科研成果评估的现状及发展趋势[J].评价与管理,2010,8(3):31-36. 被引量:6
  • 8王兰敬,杜慧平.欧美人文社会科学评价的现状与反思[J].南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学),2010,47(1):111-118. 被引量:26

二级参考文献27

  • 1杜伟.高校科研评价现状与完善途径探析[J].高等教育研究,2004,25(4):61-64. 被引量:84
  • 2马陆杰.浅论高校科研管理部门在促进科研成果转化中的作用[J].科技创业月刊,2005,4(1):99-100. 被引量:8
  • 3李森.美国大学的人才评价[J].人事管理,2001(A10):28-29. 被引量:2
  • 4李伯重.论学术与学术标准[J].社会科学论坛,2005(3):5-14. 被引量:72
  • 5刘莉.欧洲各国大学科研评价及其启示[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,26(9):86-90. 被引量:35
  • 6Mu-hsuan Huang and Yu-wei Chang," Characteristics of Research Output in Social Sciences and Humanities: from a Research Evaluation Perspective," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 ( 11 ), 2008, pp. 1818 - 1828.
  • 7Zuckennan H. and Merton R. K. ,"Age, Aging and Age Structure in Science,"in Merton R. K. (ed.), The Sociology of Science, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1973, pp. 493 - 560.
  • 8Henk F. Moed," Research Assessment in Social Sciences and Humanities,"http ://www2. lingue. unibo. it/evaluationinthehumanities/Research% 20Assessment% 20in% 20Social% 20Sciences% 20and% 20Humanities. pdf.
  • 9Henk F. Moed,'" Research Assessment in Social Sciences and Humanities," http ://www2. lingue. unibo. it/evaluationinthehumanities/Research% 20 Assessment% 20in% 20Social% 20Sciences% 20and% 20Humanities. pdf.
  • 10Geoffrey Crossick," Journals in the Arts and Humanities: their Role in Evaluation," Journals in the Arts and Humanities, 20 (3) ,2007, pp. 184 - 187.

共引文献35

同被引文献58

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部