刑法分则的四种规定

On the Preconditions of Transformed Robbery Scope

有些文章对法定拟制与注意规定进行了研究,但是该项研究有待完善。刑法分则有四种规定,对四种规定的界定是否科学合理,关乎到能否准确定罪量刑,也涉及对法律规范的正确理解,立足体系解释原理,对分则的四种规定才可能做出合理界定。基本规定是对定罪处罚的最一般规定;拟制规定是对构成彼罪的行为却按此罪论的规定;指示规定是指示司法工作人员在多种结论中如何选择一种作为处理案件的结论;提示规定是为了引起司法人员的注意而做的规定。

There are three perspectives on the content of the crime of transformed robbery. The first known transformed robbery is set up for the limited scope of crimes against property, the other is that it should be also applied to the crimes that have a relationship of laps of provisions with the crime of stealing, snatch and fraud. The last one think Only part of the violation of property law benefits can be translated into a specific crime of robbery. From the interpretation in system, this chapter criticize these arguments and concludes that it should specifically refer to crimes of the 264,266 and 267 provision.