期刊文献+

组织二元性:管理研究的一种新范式 被引量:49

Organizational Ambidexterity:A New Paradigm for Management Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 组织二元性已经逐渐成为管理研究中的一种新范式,然而,已有研究对组织二元性的内涵与外延却未能达成共识,基于对不同视角的组织二元性理论框架也略显混乱。基于组织学习、技术创新、组织架构、组织适应等领域相关研究的梳理,组织二元性的内涵与外延得以明确界定。以此为基础,搭建组织二元性跨个体、团队、组织、组织间的多层次研究框架,有利于构建中国的管理理论。 Organizational ambidexterity has become a new paradigm for management research nowadays. However, extant literature indicates that organizational ambidexterity is still undertheorized and underconceptualized, and therefore, there is no agreement about its connotation and extension. By reviewing the relevant literature of organizational learning, technological innovation, organizational architecture and organizational adaption, we try to clearly define the connotation and extension of organizational ambidexterity. Based on the definition, we then build a multi-level framework of individuals, teams, organizations and inter-organizations for organizational ambidexterity, which contributes to the construction of Chinese management theories.
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期132-142,共11页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(71132007) 国家自然科学基金项目(71072112)
关键词 组织二元性 均衡 多层次框架 管理研究 organizational ambidexterity balance multi-level framework management research
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1S. L. Brown & K. M. Eisenhardt," The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations,"Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 1(1997) ,pp. 1 - 34.
  • 2M. L. Tushman ~ C. A. O'Reilly,"Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change,"California Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 4 (1996), pp. 8 - 30.
  • 3S. Raisch, J. Birkinshaw & G. Probst, et al,"Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance,"Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 4(2009), pp. 685 - 695.
  • 4R. B. Duncan,"The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation,"The Management of Organization Design : Strategies and Implementation ,Vol. 1(1976) ,pp. 167 - 188.
  • 5D. A. Levinthal & J. G. March,"The Myopia of Learning," Strategic Management Journal,Vol. 14(1993), pp. 95 - 112.
  • 6J. G. March,"Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,"Organization Science, Vol. 2, No. 1 (1991) ,pp. 71 - 87.
  • 7S. Raisch & J. Birkinshaw," Organizational Ambidexterity.. Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators," Journal of Management ,Vol. 34,No. 3(2008), pp. 375 - 409.
  • 8Z. Simsek, C. Heavey & J. F. Veiga, et al,"A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes ,"Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46, No. 5 (2009), pp. 864 -894.
  • 9J. W. Rivkin & N. Siggelkow," Balancing Search and Stability.. Interdependencies among Elements Organizational Design,"Management Science, Vol. 49, No. 3 ( 2003), pp. 290 - 311.
  • 10P. S. Adler, B. Goldoftas & D. I. Levine,"Flexibility versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System,"Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 1 ( 1999), pp. 43 - 68.

同被引文献690

引证文献49

二级引证文献468

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部