唐朝与新罗往来研究二题——以西安周边所在的石刻碑志为中心

Two Topics of the Intercourse between the Tang Dynasty and Silla

西安及其周边地区乃汉唐都城长安辖区所在,保存着大量的历史文化遗迹。由于唐朝与朝鲜半岛国家保持有十分紧密的来往关系,入唐新罗使者、僧人、商人、留学生等纷纷来到这里,成为唐朝与周边民族国家友好交往的典范。本稿对"万年宫碑阴题名"、"乾陵六十一蕃臣像"涉及的唐朝与新罗关系问题试作论述,认为万年宫碑阴题名中应该是"左领军将军臣金仁问",而非此前一些论著所误释的薛仁贵或刘仁轨;乾陵六十一番臣像东南角的石像应为新罗人没错,但将其确定为具体的某人就有问题。

Xi＇an and the surrounding area is under Han and Tang Dynasty capital of Chang-an jurisdiction, lots of historical and civilized vestiges are preserved right here. Because of the Tang Dynasty and countries on the Korean peninsula maintained a very close intercourse, when the SiUa envoys, Buddhist monks, merchants and returned students came to Tang Dynasty they were always go to Xi＇an and the surrounding area, and this kind of relationship became a model of friendly intercourses between Tang and the neighboring nation-states. This paper tries to discuss and expound some opinions about ＂the Inscription on the back of Wan Nian Palace Stele＂ （万年宫碑阴题名） and ＂Sixty-one foreign ministers as Qian Ling Mausoleum＂ （六十一蕃臣像） involved in the relationship between Tang and Silla. I think it is ＂ZuolingJun General Courtier Kim Renwen＂ （左领军将军臣金仁问） inscribed on the back of Wan Nian Palace Stele, not Xue Rengui （薛仁贵） or Liu Rengui （刘仁轨） as the wrong explanation in some previous articles; There is no doubt that the stone statue in the southeast of the ＂Sixty-one foreign ministers as Qian Ling Mausoleum＂ is a Silla people, but it will be really difficult to confirm his exact identity.