期刊文献+

基于契约设计的联盟合作效应的实证研究 被引量:1

An Empirical Study on the Cooperative Effectiveness of Contracted Strategic Alliance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于交易成本经济学理论,将联盟的契约设计作为联盟的治理手段,提出了资产专用性、契约复杂度和联盟合作效应三者之间的概念模型,利用SPSS15.0软件和AMOS7.0软件对概念模型进行SCM实证分析并修正了概念模型,修正后的模型能够更好解释三者关系:在战略联盟中,资产专用性对契约复杂程度、合作风险、合作绩效都具有正向的影响;契约复杂程度对合作风险具有负向影响,对合作绩效具有正向影响;即资产专用性越高,企业越倾向于签订复杂的契约,并且联盟中资产的专用性程度和契约的复杂性程度对合作的绩效和风险产生重要的影响。研究结论丰富了战略联盟的理论基础,具有现实意义和应用价值。 The cooperation of a strategy alliance can be realized by designing appropriate contracts among the members in the alliance. The objective of this paper is to analyze how the contract design impacts the cooperation effectiveness. Based on the theory of trade cost economy (TCE), a related supply chain management (SCM) concept model is developed to describe the effect of the asset specificity and contract complexity on the alliance cooperation. Then, empirical analysis is carried out by using software packages SPSS15.0 and AMOS7.0. Results show that the higher the asset specificity is, the more the members in the alliance tend to have a complex business contract. Also, both the asset specificity and contract complexity have a significant effect on the performance and risk of the alliance. In this way, the results obtained in this paper reveal the governance mechanism of the contracted alliance cooperation.
出处 《工业工程》 北大核心 2011年第5期8-13,共6页 Industrial Engineering Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70672012)
关键词 战略联盟 治理机制 资产专用性 契约复杂度 合作绩效 合作风险 strategic alliance governance mechanism asset specificity contract complexity cooperation performance cooperation risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Spekman R E, Forbes T M, Isabella L A, et al. Alliance management: A view from the past and a look to the future [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1998, 35 (6): 747- 772.
  • 2李薇,龙勇.竞争性战略联盟的合作效应研究[J].科研管理,2010,31(1):160-169. 被引量:13
  • 3Das B S, Teng. Managing risks in strategic alliances[ J]. The Academy of Management Executive, 1999, 13 (4) : 50-62.
  • 4Santoro M D, McGill J P. The effect of uncertainty and asset co-specialization on governance in biotechnology alliances [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26: 1261-1269.
  • 5Sampson R. The cost of misaligned governance in R&D alli- ances [ J ]. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2004, 20 : 484-526.
  • 6Hart O, Holmstrom B. The theory of contracts[ M]//T Bew- ley. Advanced in economic theory. UK:Cambridge Universi- ty Press, 1987:71-155.
  • 7黄玉杰,万迪昉,汪应洛.我国高技术企业联盟治理结构选择的实证研究[J].管理工程学报,2008,22(4):100-104. 被引量:12
  • 8Williamson O E. The economic institutions of capitalism [M]. Free Press: New York, 1985.
  • 9Mayer K J, Argyres N S. Learning to contract: evidence from the personal computer industry [ J ]. Organization Sci- ence, 2004, 15: 394-410.
  • 10Reuer J J, Arino A. Strategic alliance contracts: Dimen- sions and determinants of contractual complexity [ J ]. Stra- tegic Management Journal, 2007,28 (3) : 313-330.

二级参考文献37

  • 1Pisano GP. Using equity participation to support exchange: Evidence from the biotechnology industry[J]. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 1989, 5(1): 109-126.
  • 2Pisano GP. The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical test[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35:153 - 176.
  • 3Gulati R, Singh H. The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43:781 -814.
  • 4Oxley JE. Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach [ J ]. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1997, 13(2): 387-409.
  • 5Oxley JE. Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: The impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of interfirm alliances[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1999, 38:283 - 309.
  • 6Osbom RN, Baughn CC. Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33:503 - 519.
  • 7Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38 (1): 85- 112.
  • 8Das TK, Tang B. Risk types and inter-firm alliance structures[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1996, 33:827 - 843.
  • 9Ring PS, Van De Ven AH. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13: 483 - 498.
  • 10Sampson RC. The cost of misaligned governance in R&D alliances [J]. Joumal of Law, Economics and Organization, 2004, 20(2): 484 - 526.

共引文献23

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部