气管切开患者不同湿化方法的效果观察

Observation the Effects of Different Humidifying Methods for Tracheotomy Patients

目的探讨气管切开病人不同湿化方法的效果。方法将60例气管切开病人随机分为2组，A组采用注射泵控制持续气道湿化，B组采用间断气管内滴入湿化。比较2组患者痰液黏稠度、痰痂形成、刺激性咳嗽、气道黏膜出血情况。结果A组各项指标优于B组，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论注射泵控制持续气道内湿化效果优于间断气管内滴注湿化液法。

Objective To evaluate the effects of different humidifying methods tbr tracheotomy patients. Methods 60 patients with tracheotomy were randomly divided into 2 groups. Syringe pump controlled continuously humidification was used in group A. Intermittent intratracheal instillation was used in group B. Stickiness of the sputum, sputum clot formation, stimulating cough and bleeding of the trachea mucosa was compared. Results Every index of group A is better than group B. And the difference is statistically significant. （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Syringe pump controlled continuously humidification has better effects than intermittent intratracheal instillation.