期刊文献+

数字断层融合技术对肺内非钙化性结节灶检出能力评价 被引量:5

Assessment on the detectability of non-calcified pulmonary nodules with chest digital tomosynthesis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨胸部数字断层融合摄影(DTS)与常规数字X线摄影(CDR)对肺部非钙化结节的检出能力。方法对41例肺内非钙化结节患者行胸部DTS和CDR检查,以MDCT结果作为参照,分析胸部DTS和CDR对肺内不同直径的非钙化结节性病灶的显示结果。结果 41例患者经CT发现260个结节,胸部DTS发现238个,CDR发现74个。胸部DTS和CDR对直径3~5mm、6~10mm及>10mm肺部非钙化结节的敏感度分别是86.36%(114/132)、95.60%(87/91)、100%(37/37)和10.61%(14/132)、37.36%(34/91)、70.27%(26/37)。对于直径≤10mm的肺部非钙化结节,胸部DTS的检出能力明显优于CDR(P<0.01)。CDR对肺内非钙化结节性病灶总的敏感度为28.46%(74/260),胸部DTS则为91.54%(238/260),二者差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论对于检出肺部非钙化结节,胸部DTS比CDR更具优势,敏感度更高,特别对于直径≤10mm的非钙化结节。 Objective To compare chest digital tomosynthesis (DTS) with convenlional digital radiography (CDR) in the detection of non-calcified puImonary nodules. Methods Totally 41 patients whb non-calclfied pulmonary nodules were examined with chest DTS and CDR. Taking MSCT findings as references, the sensitivity of chest DTS and CDR for detection of non-calcified pulmonary nodules were calculated and compared. Results CT showed 260 nodules in 41 patients, while chest DTS found 238 nodules and CDR found 74 nodules. The sensitivity for chest DTS for 3 groups nodules (3 5. 6-10 mm, 〉10 mm) was 86.36% (114/132), 95.60% (87/91), 100% (37/37), respectively, while for CDR was 10.61% (14/132), 37.36% (34/91), 70.27% (26/37), respectively. For nodules with diameter 410 ram, chest DTS could detect more lesions than CDR (P〈0. 01). The total sensitivity for CDR was 28. 46% (74/260), for DTS was 91.54% (238/260), there was statistical difference (P〈0.01). Conclusion For the detection of non-calcified puimonary nodules, chest DTS is better than CDR, especially for non calcified nodules less than 10 mm.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期2234-2237,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 断层融合术 放射摄影术 孤立性肺结节 诊断显像 Tomosynthesis Radiography Solitary pulmonary nodule Diagnostic imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1McAdams HP, Samei E, Dobbins J 3rd, et al. Recent advances in chest radiography. Radiology, 2006,241(3):663 683.
  • 2Vikgren J, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A, et al. Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases. Radiology, 2008,249(3)1034-1041.
  • 3孙志远,苏宏,赵艳娥,鞠兵,常双会,胡秋菊,卢光明.数字化体层融合在肺结节探查中的初步应用[J].中华放射学杂志,2010,44(1):33-36. 被引量:27
  • 4Dobbins JT 3rd, Godfrey DJ. Digital X-ray tomosynthesis: cur- rent state of the art and clinical potential. Phys Med Biol, 2003, 48(19) :R65-R106.
  • 5黄锐,冯敢生,杨炼,刘宇,李林,叶遐玲.双能减影和常规DR对肺结节或肿块检出能力的比较[J].放射学实践,2008,23(8):877-880. 被引量:6
  • 6Dobbins JT 3rd, McAdams HP, Godfrey DJ, et al. Digital tomo synthesis of the chest. J Thorae Imaging, 2008,23(2):86-92.
  • 7Kim EY, Chung MJ, Lee HY, et al. Pulmonary mycobacterial disease: diagnostic performance of low-dose digital tomosynthesis as compared with chest radiography. Radiology, 2010, 257 (1) : 269-277.
  • 8Svalkvist A, M~nsson LG, Bath M. Monte Carlo simulations of the dosimetry of chest tomosynthesis. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2010, 139(1-3) :144-152.
  • 9刘彬,白玫.64层螺旋CT检查中患者受照剂量的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2008,42(10):1050-1052. 被引量:23
  • 10Morin RL, Gerber TC, MeCollough CH. Radiation dose in corn puted tomography of the heart. Circulation, 2003,107(6) :917- 922.

二级参考文献29

  • 1黄锐,冯敢生,王孝英,王勇,蒋南川,张敬辉.双能减影与常规数字摄影的胸部影像对比研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2004,23(11):955-958. 被引量:18
  • 2Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC ,et al. Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 2 : dosimetric aspects. London : Chihon, 1991:249.
  • 3Shrimpton PC, Edyvean S. CT scanner dosimetry. Br J Radiol, 1998,71 : 1-3.
  • 4Miller DL, Baiter S, Wagner LK, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for recording patient radiation dose in the medical record. J Vasc Interv Radiol,2004 ,15 :423-429.
  • 5Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH. Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation, 2003, 107: 917-922.
  • 6McCollough CH. Patient dose in cardiac computed tomography. Herz,2003,28 : 1-6.
  • 7Cohnen M, Poll I.J, Puettmann C, et al. Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning. Eur Radiol,2003, 13:1148-1153.
  • 8Hidajat N, Maurer J, Schroder RJ, et al. Relationships between physical dose quantities and patient dose in CT. Br J Radiol, 1999,72:556-561.
  • 9Ren L, Zhang J, Thongphiew D, et al. A novel digital tomosynthesis (DTS) reconstruction method using a deformation field map. Med Phys,2008 ,35 :3110-3115.
  • 10Yan H, Godfrey DJ, Yin FF. Fast reconstruction of digital tomosynthesis using on-board images. Med Phys, 2008, 35 : 2162-2169.

共引文献49

同被引文献54

  • 1顾晓林,龚沈初,沈云霞.35例胸部隐匿部位的病变数字化X线摄影分析[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2007,15(1):56-58. 被引量:5
  • 2Machida H, Yuhara T, Mori T, et al. Optimizing parameters for flat-panel detector digital tomosynthesis. Radiographics, 2010,30 (2) :549-562.
  • 3Bauhs JA, Vrieze TJ, Primak AN, et al. CT Dosimetry: Com- parison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics, 2008,28(1) :245-253.
  • 4Valentin J. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Com- mission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP, 2007, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 37(2-4):1-332.
  • 5Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Hasegawa I, et al. Fast scanning tomo- synthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules: Diagnostic per- formance compared with chest radiography, using multidetector- row computed tomography as the reference. Invest Radiol, 2011, 46(8) : 471-477.
  • 6James TD, Mcadams HP, Song JW, et al. Digital tomosynthesis of the chest for lung nodule detection: Interim sensitivity results from an ongoing NIH-sponsored trial. Med Phys, 2008, 35 (6) : 2554-2557.
  • 7Vikgren J, Zaehrisson S, Svalkvist A, et al. Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: Human observer study of clinical cases. Radiology, 2008,249(3) : 1034-1041.
  • 8van't Westeinde SC, de Koning H J, Xu DM, et al. How to deal with incidentally detected pulmonary nodules less than 10 mm in size on CT in a healthy "person. Lung Cancer, 2008,60(2):151- 159.
  • 9Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H, et al. Prognostic val- ue of ground-glass opacity found in small lung adenocarcinoma on high-resolution CT scanning. Lung Cancer, 2001,33(1) :17-25.
  • 10Ikeda K, Awai K, Mori T, et al. Differential diagnosis of ground-glass opacity nodules: CT number analysis by three-di- mensional computerized quantification. Chest, 2007, 132 (3) : 984-990.

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部