期刊文献+

活性污泥和生物膜的胞外聚合物提取方法比较 被引量:20

The Comparison of Effectiveness of Different Methods in Extracting Extracellular Polymeric Substances(EPS) from Biofilm and Activated Sludge
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用加热法、NaOH法、硫酸法、阳离子交换树脂(CER)法、甲醛-NaOH法对3个污水厂的5种生物膜和活性污泥的胞外聚合物(EPS)进行提取实验研究,并以常规高速离心作为对照组.结果表明,不同的提取方法对同一种污泥的EPS各组分构成影响较大.一般情况下,提取总量按从多到少排列如下:NaOH法>加热法>甲醛-NaOH法>硫酸法>CER法>常规高速离心.其中,甲醛-NaOH法提取总量与加热法相近,但各组分的含量两者却有较大差别.甲醛的去除过程对EPS中组分的测定有干扰.NaOH法提取的EPS中DNA的含量远大于其他各种方法,通过甲醛-NaOH法的对比实验,可见NaOH法对细胞存在着一定的破坏. Five commonly used extraction,including heating,NaOH,H2SO4,cation exchange resin(CER),formaldehyde plus NaOH were selected to study their effectiveness in extracting extracellular polymeric substances(EPS) from five biofilm and activated sludge samples,using regular centrifugation as a control method.The results showed that the EPS content and the proportion of the components were strongly dependent on the extraction methods.The efficiency of the extraction methods,in decreasing order,for all sludge samples in general was: NaOH heating formaldehyde plus NaOH H2SO4CER regular centrifugation.The total EPS extracted by formaldehyde plus NaOH was similar to those extracted by heating,but the content of each components of EPS were quite different.The removal process of formaldehyde greatly affected the determination of the components of the EPS.The EPS extracted by NaOH constituted much more DNA than any other methods.Compared with the extraction results by formaldehyde plus NaOH,the NaOH method might cause cell lysis in some extent.
出处 《复旦学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期556-562,共7页 Journal of Fudan University:Natural Science
基金 污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室开放基金资助项目(PCRRF10003)
关键词 胞外聚合物(EPS) 活性污泥 生物膜 提取方法 extracellular polymeric substances(EPS) activated sludge biofilm extraction methods
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Wingender J, Neu T R, Flemming H C. Microbial extraeellular polymeric substances --characterization, structure and function[M]. Berlin: Springer, 1999.
  • 2Ge L Y, Deng H H, Wang H W, et al. Comparison of extraction methods for quantifying extracellular polymers in activated sludges[J]. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin,2007,16(3) .- 299-303.
  • 3Abzac P D, Bordas F, Van Hullebusch E, et al. Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances(EPS) from anaerobic granular sludges: comparison of chemical and physical extraction protocols[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology , 2010,85(5) : 1589-1599.
  • 4Liu Y, Fang H H P. Influence of extracellular polymeric substances(EPS) on flocculation, settling, and dewatering of activated sludge[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2003, 33(3) .. 237-273.
  • 5Zhang X Q, Bishop P L, Kupferle M J. Measurement of polysaccharides and proteins in biofilm extracellular polymers[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1998,37(4-5) .. 345-348.
  • 6Forster C J. Activated sludge surfaces in relation to the sludge volume index[J]. Water Research, 1971,5: 861-870.
  • 7Morgan J W, Forster C F, Evison L A. Comparative study of the nature of biopolymers extracted from anaerobic and activated sludge[J]Water Research, 1990,24(6) .. 743-750.
  • 8Comte S, Guibaud G, Baudu M. Relations between extraction protocols for activated sludge extracellular polymeric substances(EPS) and eomplexation properties of Pb and Cd with EPS Part II. Consequences of EPS extraction methods on Pb2+ and Cd2+ complexationf[J]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2006, 38(1-2) .. 246-252.
  • 9Chen Y G, Yang H Z, Gu G W. Effect of acid and surfactant treatment on activated sludge dewatering and settling[J]. Water Research ,2001,35(11) : 2615-2620.
  • 10Brown M J, Lester J N. Comparison of bacterial extracellular polymer extraction methods[J]. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 1980,40(2):179-185.

同被引文献259

引证文献20

二级引证文献151

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部