法律解释方法批判:主观还是客观

Questioned the Legal Interpretation Under the Concept of Subjectivism and Objectivism

司法实践中,法官应该绝对忠于法律,法治原则强调法律解释的客观性,以实现法律的公正与权威。然而,法官所采用的文义解释、目的解释、体系解释、历史解释、法意解释等解释方法实际上根本无法达到解释的客观性。法律解释的过程实际上是客观性与主观性的辩证统一,法官真正应该追求的是无限接近法律的价值内涵而不是绝对客观。

In judicial practice,judges should be absolutely faithful to the law.The rule of law emphasizes the objectivity of legal interpretation in order to achieve a just and legal authority.However,the judge adopted the text explains,the purpose of interpretation,systematic interpretation,historical interpretation,explanations to explain the method actually can not explain the objectivity.Legal interpretation of the process is actually objective and subjective dialectical unity,what the judge should really be after is infinitely close to the law rather than the absolute value of the content objective.